Answered You can buy a ready-made answer or pick a professional tutor to order an original one.
Research Methods in Criminal Justice and Criminology Ninth Edition Chapter 3
1. Were any causal assertions made or implied in the hypotheses or in subsequent discussion? What approach was used to demonstrate the existence of causal effects? Were all 3 issues in establishing causal relationships addressed (temporal order, correlation, removing rival causal factors)? What, if any, variables were controlled in the analysis to reduce the risk of spurious relationships and rival causal factors?
2. Which of the 8 possible variables (factors) listed on page 68 of your textbook that affect the internal validity of the conclusions concern you the most as it relates to this research article? Explain and justify your response.
3. Briefly describe the difference between a cross-sectional and longitudinal design. What are the pros and cons of using each? Describe the longitudinal aspect of Kempinen & Kurlychek's (2003).
- @
- 966 orders completed
- ANSWER
-
Tutor has posted answer for $15.00. See answer's preview
******** ******* ** *********** and Criminal ******* *** *********** **** ******** ******* **** ******** ***** the ************* ************* Program **** averaged ******* *** ********* **** is *** **** ** ******** * correlation among *** impacts which ******* *** ******* ******** standard ***** Therefore *** **** ****** **** ** * conservative approach By ******** ** the ******** ***** ***** *** ******* variables *** ***** ***** of the ******** ******** whether the ********** ********* *********** *** facility ****** Control ********* **** on ***** ******* **** might ****** *** ********* and *********** ********* *** ******** **** of *** ******* **** ***** **** black ****** perceive *** ******* ****** ** ** ********** **** ***** ************* ******* American *** also **** ****** ** **** ******** *********** **** ******** *** as * ****** ***** the ***** with worse ********* **** ***** ******* ***** *** ** ******* ******* ******** *** older ******* and *********** **** ******* ******** ********* Finally ********* ***** ******** we ******** *** ****** ** ************ *********** on a ****** in legality *** then **** whether ***** *********** determines why *** ******** **** *********** ************** ***** *** ************ ****** *********** ******* *** conditions of the study ** ***** ****** **** ********* and inadequately ********* **** ****** so many ********* ***** *** way the ***** impact **** take * ***** view ** ***** ***** ** ***** the ********** *** ** ****** *** more ********* ***** ************ *** this will usually **** to **** ******* **** *** ***** ******* produces affect *** internal ********************* ****** ******* that ******** **** internal *** ******** ******** *** this ** often hard ** ******* ** *********** ******* * ********** ***** to **** *** * ****** to internal ******** ******** and **** ********* **** assessing the ******** ******** ** a link ** * ******** process in which *** ********** has to ************** think ******* *** each ** *** ******** ******** threats *** be dealt ************ * ** * *************** ***** **** **** *** samples *** ***** from the **** ***** *** the same ******** ** studied ** them *** ** * longitudinal study ********* *** ********* ** *** ** more definite ****** ** **** To ******* **** * *************** ***** ***** two ** **** ******* **** *** point ** the same **** The **** ********* are then ******** ** *** *** ******* ***** On the other hand ** a ************ study variables are measured in * ****** ***** **** **** It *** **** ***** including ***** ***** ****** Study *** Panel ***** ******** *** *************** ***** ****** *********** **** different ****** ** a ********** but * ************ ***** ***** *** ** gross ********** ***** a ****** *** the ******* ********* in ********** in * ***** ******* *************** ***** ****** * quick indication ** snapshot of *** ********* being studied Usually they refer ** * ************** ****** ** *** group and therefore ******* *********** ** ********** their ******* (Hagan) *************** ******** design pervades criminology *** ******** ******* ***** Hirschi’s ***** ***** ** causes ** ***** utilizes a *************** ****** ** which ** asked *** a ****** of ********* related ** participating ** ********** ***** *** ********* **** to ****** bondsLongitudinal ******** *** as ** **** **** ***** ** *** * designs *** *** ******** **** *** *** ***** *** ***** *** ****** ******* Both ** ***** ******* **** the same group **** * ****** ** **** and *** ******** ******** with valuing within *** ******* ***** ************** ***** ******* ********** *** **** ********** ** ****** **** **** *** ****** ******* ********* **** ******* *********** ** **** ****** **** **** ******** and Kurlychek's ****** *** ******** ******** of *** boys **** Philadelphia ** 1945 who were supposed *** ** ** ** ********************************************* * ************ *** Criminal ******* Research: ******** ************ ** ***** *** Justice ********* May ** 2017 **** **************** ************************************************************************************************************** Campbell Donald T ***** ******* Julian * (1963) Experimental *** ****************** Designs *** ******** Chicago: Rand ******** Hagan ***** * (1994) ******** ******* in Criminal ******* and *********** 3d ** New ***** ********** ******** Marvin E; ****** Robert ** *** Sellin Thorsten * (1972) *********** ** * ***** ****** ******** ********** ** ******* ****** ******************* ****** ******************* ********* ** *** **** **** ***************************************************************************************************************************************************************** **************************************************************************************** ******
