research Paper You will respond to three separate prompts but prepare your paper as one paper. Be sure to include at least one UC library source per prompt, in addition to your textbook (which means y

research Paper

You will respond to three separate prompts but prepare your paper as one paper. Be sure to include at least one UC library source per prompt, in addition to your textbook (which means you'll have at least 4 sources cited).

Start your paper with an introductory paragraph.

Prompt 1 "Data Warehouse Architecture" (2-3 pages): Explain the major components of a data warehouse architecture, including the various forms of data transformations needed to prepare data for a data warehouse. Also, describe in your own words current key trends in data warehousing.

Prompt 2 "Big Data" (2-3 pages): Describe your understanding of big data and give an example of how you’ve seen big data used either personally or professionally. In your view, what demands is big data placing on organizations and data management technology?

Prompt 3 “Green Computing” (2-3 pages): One of our topics in Chapter 13 surrounds IT Green Computing. The need for green computing is becoming more obvious considering the amount of power needed to drive our computers, servers, routers, switches, and data centers. Discuss ways in which organizations can make their data centers “green”. In your discussion, find an example of an organization that has already implemented IT green computing strategies successfully. Discuss that organization and share your link. You can find examples in the UC Library.

Conclude your paper with a detailed conclusion section.

The paper needs to be approximately 7-10 pages long, including both a title page and a references page (for a total of 9-12 pages). Be sure to use proper APA formatting and citations to avoid plagiarism.

Your paper should meet the following requirements:

• Be approximately seven to ten pages in length, not including the required cover page and reference page.

• Follow APA7 guidelines. Your paper should include an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a conclusion.

• Support your answers with the readings from the course, the course textbook, and at least three scholarly journal articles to support your positions, claims, and observations, in addition to your textbook. The UC Library is a great place to find supplemental resources.

• Be clearly and well-written, concise, and logical, using excellent grammar and style techniques. You are being graded in part on the quality of your writing.

Topic: You may choose any Bioethical topic. The topic must have an ethical/moral component that goes beyond a simple informative consideration.

Some topics include:

Abortion

Aged Care

Bioethics

Cloning

Consent

Contraception

Disability

Euthanasia

Genetics

Healthcare

Human Embryos &

Gametes

Moral Agency &

Legal Advocacy

Neonatal Ethics

Neuroethics

Organ Donation

Reproductive

Technology

Research Ethics

Stem Cells

Substance Abuse

Surrogacy

Details:

• 5 pages in length (Titles page and bibliography are NOT pages)
• You must demonstrate that you have researched the topic in addition to your own thoughts on the issue. Your paper should contain a balanced/fair analysis of both sides of the moral issue.
• Format should be MLA / Double Spaced

Written Communication Scoring Rubric

Competency in use of philosophical terminology for written communication

To demonstrate excellent writing style, characterized by a variety of sentence structures, the use of proper English grammar, usage, punctuation and spelling; to employ applicable philosophical terms precisely and in their proper context and to spell them correctly

To demonstrate adequate writing style characterized by correct sentence structure, with minimal errors in English grammar, usage, punctuation, and spelling; to incorporate some philosophical terms, spell them correctly, and use them in their proper context

To demonstrate improper sentence structure, with significant errors in English grammar, usage, punctuation, and spelling; to avoid use of philosophical terms, to misspell them, or to use them in the wrong context