Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
respond
Answer the questions after reading the book and be careful for these:
1- use easy words and simple english.
2-no plagiarism . because i will in addition to submitting thesis to Turnitin
3- highlight the answer on the book , and mention the answer pages on the answer sheet.
However, in the next remaining weeks to get all 25 points you must link what you read to either some personal observation or a newspaper article or blog post or something going on in the world.
Reading response memoStudent Discussion leader Natalie Helton ( chapter 2&4) from bookshelf Planning Local Economic Development
Attachments:
Each week, students will be required to respond in writing to the reading topic by analyzing and applying the concepts from the reading to economic development in practice. These responses will be submitted electronically via the course Blackboard page prior to class.
Students should critically reflect on the concepts and lessons they draw from the week’s readings, and apply those concepts as they are observed in economic development practice in the world around us. Successful (A-level) memos will include references to one or more articles or other news items that reflect current economic development issues and connect to the week’s topic, and analyze the way(s) example(s) relate to, reflect, and/or conflict with the principles laid out in the course readings for the week.
Your thoughtful write-ups should be equivalent to approximately 1-2 single-spaced pages and should address the following questions:
a. What substantive insights into the week’s topic did you gain from the readings?
b. What benefits, advantages, tensions, conflicts, trade-offs, or challenges relative to economic development came across in the readings in terms of implementing a particular process, tool, or strategy and its prospects for achieving successful outcomes?
c. What strengths and shortcomingswere apparent in the author(s)’ discussion? Which points seemed reasonable? Which assertions were problematic? Why?