Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Sam Harris argues that the problem of accounting for the existence and apparent random distribution of pain, and suffering – and evil more generally – is intractable for a religion which proposes a God who is omniscient, omnipotent, and perfectly benefice
450 words due by 3 p.m Eastern Standard Time. No outside work just work from Sam Harris The End of Belief, "The Science of Good and Evil"
This is the full question:
Sam Harris argues that the problem of accounting for the existence and apparent random distribution of pain, and suffering – and evil more generally – is intractable for a religion which proposes a God who is omniscient, omnipotent, and perfectly beneficent. On the other hand, that is supposed to be perfectly intelligible within a scientific framework. How is that supposed to work?
