SHEILA- UP TO 9/8/2024- ***** PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT ALL WORK IS AUTHENTIC***** ****** THIS ASSIGNMENT HAS 2 PARTS / PLEASE LABEL EACH PART SEPARATELY WITH REFERENCES WHEN COMPLETED****** PART 1- M

SHEILA- UP TO 9/8/2024-

***** PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT ALL WORK IS AUTHENTIC*****

****** THIS ASSIGNMENT HAS 2 PARTS / PLEASE LABEL EACH PART SEPARATELY WITH REFERENCES WHEN COMPLETED******

PART 1- Module 3- ASSIGNMENT 4.3- (SHEILA)- Case 4.3: The Would-be Borrower  

Case 4.3: The Would-be Borrower, to what extent do your options for approaching a conflict depend on the other person's behavior? Think of a situation in which you have wanted to use a collaborating style and found that the response you received made it difficult or impossible. What styles would you have used if you were Joan or Mary? Might the conflict have turned out differently had they chosen different approaches? The paper should be analytic and relevant to topic under consideration. Be sure to include personal insight, and religious and moral beliefs.

SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS: 3 pages, formatted and cited in current APA style with a minimum of 3 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. 

PART 2- Module 3- ASSIGNMENT 6.3 - (SHEILA)- Case 6.3: The Controversial Team Member

After watching the following video: https://youtu.be/r4xPwhcnS-Q?si=QPC91hz56RpU3_7J

What are the 3 ways to resolve a conflict when dealing with a controversial team member. The paper should be analytic and relevant to topic under consideration. Be sure to include personal insight, and religious and moral beliefs.

SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS: 3 pages, formatted and cited in current APA style with a minimum of 3 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.