Some have argued that the best approach to fight high tech crime is the use of deterrents.

Some have argued that the best approach to fight high tech crime is the use of deterrents. For instance, it has been argued that high-technology defenses such as intrusion detection, will decrease the likelihood that a website will be hacked. Do you think that deterrents would have a greater effect on high tech crime than they do on traditional crime? If so why or why not?