Some observers have responded to harsh criticism of World Bank policies in the 1990s and 2000s by arguing that the World Bank's net-donor members

Some observers have responded to harsh criticism of World Bank policies in the 1990s and 2000s by arguing that the World Bank’s net-donor members have saddled it with conflict goals by requiring it to maintain a significant revenue stream of its own. Do you agree that the World Bank confronts conflicts objectives? If not, why not? If so, which of the allegedly conflicting goals do you think should take precedence?