Answered You can buy a ready-made answer or pick a professional tutor to order an original one.
Stephen Hemmerling was a driver for the Happy Cab Co. Hemmerling paid certain fixed expenses and abided by a variety of rules related to the use of the cab,
Stephen Hemmerling was a driver for the Happy Cab Co. Hemmerling paid certain fixed expenses and abided by a variety of rules related to the use of the cab, the hours that could be worked, and the solicitation of fares, among other things. Rates were set by the state. Happy Cab did not withhold taxes from Hemmerling's pay. While driving the cab, Hemmerling was injured in an accident and filed a claim against Happy Cab in a Nebraska state court for Worker's Compensation benefits. Such benefits are not available to independent contractors. On what basis might the court hold that Hemmerling IS an employee? Explain fully.Stephen Hemmerling was a driver for the Happy Cab Co. Hemmerling paid certain fixed expenses and abided by a variety of rules related to the use of the cab, the hours that could be worked, and the solicitation of fares, among other things. Rates were set by the state. Happy Cab did not withhold taxes from Hemmerling's pay. While driving the cab, Hemmerling was injured in an accident and filed a claim against Happy Cab in a Nebraska state court for Worker's Compensation benefits. Such benefits are not available to independent contractors. On what basis might the court hold that Hemmerling IS an employee? Explain fully.
- @
- 57 orders completed
- ANSWER
-
Tutor has posted answer for $10.00. See answer's preview
******* ********** *** a ****** *** the Happy Cab ** Hemmerling **** ******* ***** ******** and ****** ** * ******* ** rules related ** *** *** ** the ***