Ten months before he attained the age of majority, John Adamowski paid for and received a course in elementaryaviation from Curtiss-Wright Flying...

Ten months before he attained the age of majority, John Adamowski paid for and received a course in elementaryaviation from Curtiss-Wright Flying Service. Five months later, he purchased and received a limited commercialpilot’s course from the same company. Two months after receiving the commercial pilot’s license, he entered into acontract with Curtiss-Wright for an advanced course of instruction to become a transport pilot, but he withdrew fromthe course within the month and paid nothing.Six months after reaching the age of majority, Adamowski received a bill from Curtiss-Wright for the balancedue on his course. He visited Curtiss-Wright’s attorney and denied liability but said nothing about disaffirmance. Hetook no further action until a few days shy of a year from the date on which he had attained the age of majority. Atthat time, he filed suit against Curtiss-Wright, seeking to disaffirm his contracts for the aviation courses and recoverthe money he had paid for them on grounds that he had entered into the contracts as a minor and thus had the right todisaffirm them and receive back what he had given up under the contracts. Curtiss-Wright argued that the courseswere necessaries and, as such, that Adamowski was not entitled to disaffirm the contracts for them.

1.Were the contracts for necessaries and, as such, not subject to being disaffirmed?

2.Even if the plaintiff had the right to disaffirm the contracts, was almost a year too long to wait to disaffirm them?