Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
The data set I decided to look at was the comparison with life expectancy to CO2 emissions.
The data set I decided to look at was the comparison with life expectancy to CO2 emissions. When the data showed itself I was baffled because the life expectancy seemed to be higher with the higher amounts of CO2. For example in the United States the life expectancy was 79.1 years with the CO2 emissions at 16.4 tonnes per person. Compared to China's whose life expectancy was 75.7 years with CO2 levels at 7.52 tonnes and India's at 66.5 years and CO2 levels at 1.59 tonnes. The data started to make more sense when I stopped looking at it with the association that the carbon dioxide had to the harm it was dong to the environment and more towards the fact that these are the countries who are more developed then others. An example of a less developed country is Somalia whose life expectancy was 54.1 years with the CO2 emissions at 0.0607 tonnes. I concluded that my chart wasn't very accurate with its correlation between life expectancy and CO2 emissions, but more accurate in showing that the countries that had more emissions were in fact the ones who were more developed and had the resources to deal with the increasing levels of CO2.
This is what I discovered, but what are your thoughts?
