Answered You can buy a ready-made answer or pick a professional tutor to order an original one.
This is Business Law assignment I have to write an short essay , just 1page of essay.I have to figure out whether Diana should prevail in the lawsuit against Arnold, and if so, the remedy that should
This is Business Law assignment I have to write an short essay , just 1page of essay.I have to figure out whether Diana should prevail in the lawsuit against Arnold, and if so, the remedy that should be awarded by the court, setting forth your reasons for any conclusions stated.So, I figure out this is a kind of protection of minorites:-Prtection of minority remedies-shareholders have limited liability -> up to their contribution.-therefore, Arnold should Dissolution.Is my figure out right solution?and if it is wrong , could you just show every thing that i have to right for this essay?thanks
- @
- 165 orders completed
- ANSWER
-
Tutor has posted answer for $12.00. See answer's preview
****** of the ******** shareholdersIn *** ******* **** ***** ****** ** a ******** shareholder Minority ************ **** ***** shareholders **** *** *** ****** ** *** company like ***** ** receive *********** ***** to vote ***** ** ****** ** **** * ******* ******* ***** ** be treated ** *** with the ***** ************ ***** ** ** involved ** ********** *** ******* *** ***** ** **** law suit or ** ****** of the company Dianna has all the ****** to *** on ****** ** *** ******* ** well ** ****** ** *** ***** of law ** wind up the company ** one of *** ********* ****** has ***** ** **** ******** ****** **** *** ******** ** *** company ****** *** ***** an ****** that is *** ********* *** *** ******* ***** a minority *********** ****** **** have ** ****** the ******* of *** ******** *********** *** *** *** sue ** the ****** ** *** feels that *** *** done by the ******** is beyond the ******* ** *** company’s ********** ** *********** and ******** ** association In **** **** *** ******** gets *** right ** *** the ******** ** ****** of *** ******* ** ******** *** transaction *** reason ***** *** ******** ** the ******** ** the ******* is not ******* to **** ******** ******* ** ** ******** **** ** beyond *** ******** ** ********** ** *********** *** **** in such cases ******* ******* ****** sense *** ****** *** minority ** **** **** **** ************* * ******** *********** ** oppresses *** ******** *********** **** *** ***** ** **** ** *** ***** ** **** ******* **** *** ******* *** *********** of *** ******* Winding ** ** *********** ** a *** **** *** *** ** taken after ******* analysis ** *** ********* ** *** ** ******* ***** the ***** ******* **** *** ********* ** ******** of *** ******* have acted in self ******** ** **** ******** ******* rather than *** ******** ** all the *********** ie the *** so ********* is ****** ** *** ************ of *** ******* **** ***** **** ****** treatment *** been **** ** ********* ** *** ********* ** *** ******** of *** company **** ** ********** **** *** ***** ***** ***** ** breach of *** ******* **** ** *** ********** ** articles of associationIn *** ***** case ** ** ** ** ****** ** ***** *** **** the ****** of *** ******** was ****** the ******* laid **** ** ********** or ******** ** association After *** act *** **** proved ** be ****** *** ****** on *** shareholders the court can take a ********** **** ** ****** *** situation ******* ******** *** ******* ** of the ******* ** ** ******* ****
