Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
United States v. Iverson 162 F.3d 1015 (9th Cir. 1998) Appellant Iverson appealed a conviction of four counts of violating the Clean Water Act...
ANALYZE THE ACTIONS OF MR. IVERSON VS THE WPH PRINCIPALS OF ETHICAL DECISION MAKING. NO WHERE DO YOU EVEN MENTION THE WPH. PLEASE REVIEW PAGE 15 OF THE TEXT AND REWRITE THIS ASSIGNMENT. IN ORDER TO ANALYZE SOMETHNG LIKE THIS, YOU MUST STATE THE FACTS, WHICH YOU HAVE SOMEWHAT DONE SO FAR, AND THEN STATE THE RULES YOU ARE COMPARING THE FACTS TO. THE RULES ARE THE METHODS DESCRIBED IN THE WPH TO REACH AN ETHICAL DECISSION. THEN YOU COMPARE THAT MR. IVERSON DID TO THE CONSIDERATIONS OF THE WPH AND SEE IF YOU THINK HE FOLLOWED THOSE METHODS TO REACH HIS DECISSION AND WHETHER OR NOT HAD HE FOLLWED THE RULES WOULD HAVE HIS DECISSIONS BEEN DIFFERENT.1 page ""link to find the wph framework on page 15 http://highered.mcgraw-hill.com/sites/dl/free/0073377686/671584/Sample_Chapter_02.pdf
