Using New York Civil Practice Law and Rules section cited in the lecture and reading Estate of Weingeroff v.

Using New York Civil Practice Law and Rules section cited in the lecture and reading Estate of Weingeroff v. Pilatus Aircraft, as well as the sufficient minimum contacts test, discuss 

[1] On what facts did the court in Estate of Weingeroff v. Pilatus Aircraft base its decision? Was there jurisdiction in that case?

[2] The ability of the New York court in my example to assert long arm jurisdiction over the following 

[a] Walt's Ford;

[b] Ford Motor Company and

[c] Hawaii Ford.

Please explain fully.