Write 14 page essay on the topic Critical Approaches to Security: Turkish Case Study.Download file to see previous pages... Realist perspectives in security are considered as one of the pioneer approa

Write 14 page essay on the topic Critical Approaches to Security: Turkish Case Study.

Realist perspectives in security are considered as one of the pioneer approaches of both national security and international relations and security. This period was characterized by increased suspicion and tension between countries, which led to the need for countries to strengthen independent security systems and apparatus. Traditional approach to security considers the state as the sole actor and custodian of international security . Within this context, countries are forced to develop power for the continuity of the state in the face of international politics and security. Under this system therefore, the behavior of the states move from being one based on international cooperation into selfishness and the desire to maximize power. This approach thus subscribe to the human nature that is guided by the desire to achieve internal influence in the face of internal competition and pressures . This approach is thus weak and unconstructive due to the egoist nature exhibited that advanced the approach. Despite the misconception represent the views and needs of the citizens within the country, the minority leaders and political representatives develop a program of power accumulation for international political reasons . Traditional approaches to security as based on three principles that were developed by Hobbes in which he argues that just like in the normal human being, traditional security approaches are informed by the need for the development of strong competition, diffidence and glory....

Realist and critical security perspective Realist perspectives in security are considered as one of the pioneer approaches of both national security and international relations and security. This period was characterized by increased suspicion and tension between countries, which led to the need for countries to strengthen independent security systems and apparatus. Traditional approach to security considers the state as the sole actor and custodian of international security4. Within this context, countries are forced to develop power for the continuity of the state in the face of international politics and security. Under this system therefore, the behavior of the states move from being one based on international cooperation into selfishness and the desire to maximize power. This approach thus subscribe to the human nature that is guided by the desire to achieve internal influence in the face of internal competition and pressures5. This approach is thus weak and unconstructive due to the egoist nature exhibited that advanced the approach. Despite the misconception represent the views and needs of the citizens within the country, the minority leaders and political representatives develop a program of power accumulation for international political reasons6. Traditional approaches to security as based on three principles that were developed by Hobbes in which he argues that just like in the normal human being, traditional security approaches are informed by the need for the development of strong competition, diffidence and glory. Competing interest between different countries is responsible for the continued attacks conducted by different countries in order to gain competitive advantage7 (Jones, 2001).