Write 4 page essay on the topic Peer Critique 1.1a.This also led me to believe that the author would also go into some detail about the research that has already been done so that they can show why th

Write 4 page essay on the topic Peer Critique 1.1a.

This also led me to believe that the author would also go into some detail about the research that has already been done so that they can show why there are holes in the current research, which I discovered to be true the more that I read on.

Within this introductory paragraph, the author makes it known that research has already been undergone on the topic of the harms and benefits of artificial sweeteners, though this paragraph does not reveal the specific kinds of research that they will be focusing on. However, the author sets up the literature review to explain that further research needs to be on this topic. the purpose of the literature review is not only to show what research has been done and what conclusions have been made, but also to reveal the holes in the these findings. The author feels that the current findings from research are outdated and, by showing the past studies and their conclusions, reveals that this is true.

The author chose to organize the research that they are reviewing by first offering an introduction to their topic, then introducing the body of the research, which discusses the cancerous side effects of artificial sweeteners, which looked at the findings of research centered on discovering cancer-related downfalls of artificial sweeteners, as well as the areas where more research should be done. The next portion of research looks to the non-cancerous side effects of artificial sweeteners. This is then followed by a section that is dedicated to the studies that have proven that artificial sweeteners also have their health benefits, such as weight loss. In these aforementioned sections, each section is also ordered based on gender in terms of who is affected the most by the sweetener. The literature review then closes out with a conclusion that briefly goes over what was discussed throughout the rest of the literature review.

The structure described above is a