Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Write 6 pages thesis on the topic the reason as a way of knowing. Everyone knows that when something is dropped down to the open air such as a ball, it falls to the ground, or if a chair is thrown up
Write 6 pages thesis on the topic the reason as a way of knowing. Everyone knows that when something is dropped down to the open air such as a ball, it falls to the ground, or if a chair is thrown up to the air it will fall back down. This is not something that is learned. It is basic reasoning and instincts we are born with, common to all humankind. However, why it happened had not been discovered until the law of gravitation was proposed by Isaac Newton in the late 17th century (this, however, has to do with knowledge).
Knowledge may sometimes be intertwined with a reason as a way of knowing as the above example. The reason, however, has a great advantage in some other ways of knowing since it is entirely rational. Nevertheless, the reason does have some weaknesses which cause a way of knowing come out as inadequate for gaining proper and complete knowledge. This is why one should not rely entirely on reason as a way of knowing.
“You are not thinking you are merely being logical.2” This quote can be viewed both positively and negatively at first read. It was originally said by Neils Bohr to Albert Einstein. The intention referring to this quote is to show how being logical can often lead to astounding discoveries that are, most of the time, mistaken to be resultants of another way of knowing.
Another way of looking at the quote is by linking it to a different way of knowing such as emotion. All ways of knowing to happen to be complementing each other. They, in fact, need to be so. But when it comes to reason and emotion as ways of knowing the two do not seem to be quite interdependent or complementary to each other. Deductive reasoning can sometimes prevent this from happening by using false premises in a syllogism, which means that the reasoning might be wrong but the conclusion is right which allows the arguments to be considered as valid.
 .
