Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.

QUESTION

Write 6 pages with APA style on The Destiny of the Unevangelized Debate:. when we confuse what seems either pleasurable or painful or pleasurable to humans, with what is really good or evil in God’s e

Write 6 pages with APA style on The Destiny of the Unevangelized Debate:. when we confuse what seems either pleasurable or painful or pleasurable to humans, with what is really good or evil in God’s eyes, and finally by commenting on how inclusivism undermines the great commission1.

2Pluralism can be termed as the belief that all religious ways point to one direction and to one God, even if the belief ways themselves are contradictory. Pluralism says that the agnostics, the unevangelized, Christians, Hindus, Muslims, and the tribal religions all lead to the one God. In relation to pluralism, Christ is not wanted on both epistemological and ontological grounds.

Exclusivism is the understanding or belief that Christ is the only way to get to God. In Exclusivism there are two considerations, Inclusivism and Restrictivism. Inclusivism would explain that Christ’s atonement is the best way that any human being can be saved, but that one does not essentially necessitate to have knowledge of Christ in order for the atonement to be applied to them. In inclusivism, Christ is required ontologically but not epistemologically. On the other hand, restrictivism is the belief that understanding of and trust in the Gospel is crucial for any human being to be saved. Majority of the evangelists embrace this view. In restrictivism Christ is required ontologically and epistemologically.

3One of the most challenging theological questions that are considered by the human mind is: what happens to individuals who have not at all had an opportunity to hear about the saving preaching or gospel of Jesus Christ? Are they condemned through without their fault, are they part of the elect without knowing it, or, should they be taken to be within the redemptive activity of our sovereign God?

In approaching this argument, Boyd and Eddy, have become entrenched in one of three dissimilar camps4. “The pluralist holds onto the belief that a good number of ways usually lead to God. On the other hand, the inclusivist believes that many&nbsp.

Show more
LEARN MORE EFFECTIVELY AND GET BETTER GRADES!
Ask a Question