Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Write a 11 pages paper on legal aspects of supply chain management. The M.D. would like to clarify some details of the contractual report based on these guidelines. The less favoured common laws (or c
Write a 11 pages paper on legal aspects of supply chain management. The M.D. would like to clarify some details of the contractual report based on these guidelines. The less favoured common laws (or case laws) for contracts are developed through individual contractual decisions by judges necessary to decide cases brought before them. On the other hand, statutes formed via legislations have become the commonest source of contract laws. These statutes are actually derived through Acts of UK Parliament. Since the sales of goods are within the United Kingdom, it is important to note that all statutes can be applied to any combination of jurisdictions within the UK, whereas the common law jurisdictions are more limited.
In order for the contract to be legally binding under local English law and statutes, it requires the main following contractual elements: an offer and an acceptance.With respect to frozen food contracts, these basic contract requirements require careful consideration.
With respect to offer of a contract, it is an expression of willingness for both parties, MorrisBury (buyer) and Freeze'n'Go (seller), to agree on certain bilateral terms that would benefit both sides. It must be made with the intention that the contract will become binding upon acceptance. The nature of an offer can be encapsulated by a case involving the defendant, Manchester City Council. The Council decided to sell houses that it owned to sitting tenants. In two cases, the claimants entered into agreements with the Council. The Council then resolved not to sell housing unless it was contractually bound to do so. In this case, the question arose as to whether or not the Council had entered into a contract. In the case [25], the Court of Appeal found that there was a binding contract. The Council had sent Storer a communication that they intended would be binding upon his acceptance. All Storer had to do to bind himself to the later sale was to sign the document and return it.
In similarity, MorrisBury could make an unconditional offer which could be accepted by Freeze'n'Go.In this case, if the supplier informs buyer that the offer is accepted, there will be a binding contract.It is particularly important for the buyer wanting to purchase frozen foods are interpreted as a legal binding contract.If MorrisBury constitute a formal offer to receive certain foods, then the they may be in breach of civil and even criminal laws if there are certain categories of Freeze'n'Go who would not ordinarily be entitled to sell which are being offered [1].
For an offer to be effective, an offer must be communicated. Another way of stating this is to say that there can be no acceptance of the offer without knowledge of the offer. The reason for this requirement is that if we say that a contract is an agreed bargain, there can be no agreement without knowledge. There can be no meeting of the minds if Freeze'n'Go is unaware of the MorrisBury. Stated another way, an acceptance cannot mirror an offer if the acceptance is made in ignorance of the offer.