Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Write a 2 page essay on Ethical and Religious Perspectives.The central tenet behind war’s acceptability is grounded on an absolutist or consequentialist reasoning, which placed the attainment of pea
Write a 2 page essay on Ethical and Religious Perspectives.
The central tenet behind war’s acceptability is grounded on an absolutist or consequentialist reasoning, which placed the attainment of peace at the core of its justification. With this, the attainment of peace is deemed to be a just cause for having war, especially when it is a response to a threat or an act of aggression.
It is claimed, therefore, that this reasoning elevated the justification for war as it placed it on the need to side with what is right. In Immanuel Kant’s terms, it becomes an ‘ought’ that man must do willingly.
It concluded with a visitation of the Christian’s social doctrine on solidarity and brotherhood. This reiterates the sameness of human essence as the primary reason why one should love his neighbor like his real brother, which directly opposed war.
I like to respond to this work in two ways. Firstly, I want to explore the basic ideas presented as justification for war, specifically, the emphasis on the attainment of peace through bloody means. Secondly, I want to expound on the social doctrine showed as the right attitude toward human disputes by touching lightly on the concept of common good.
As for the justification for war, it is clear that the achievement of worldly peace can never be used as reason for the death of people because of war. While it is true that man is ought to follow what is right, the determination of a right act is the most essential task. Due to variances on ethical judgments, sometimes, the wrong means are chosen although its ends are heroic. As in the case of war, although the intended goal is to protect the lives of the oppressed through the use of force, it still does not diminish the inherent wrongness of killing. Since the object chosen is bad in itself, it cannot be morally justified however noble its end is. At this point, an essential question can be raised: how can an act be evaluated to ensure that it is truly moral? Unfortunately, this has not been touched in the essay,
