Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Write a 4 page essay on Current event.Fingerprint scanning is a new method unveiled by phone manufacturers as an alternative way of getting information from personal devices such as smartphones. FBI h
Write a 4 page essay on Current event.
Fingerprint scanning is a new method unveiled by phone manufacturers as an alternative way of getting information from personal devices such as smartphones. FBI has criticized the ruling claiming that the ruling would place users above the law. The complainant considered an appeal to overturn the password ruling in Virginia court.
The law: The article addresses the components of Fifth Amendment Act in the United States constitution. The act gives criminal suspects the right to avoid incriminating themselves to court cases by way of providing secret passwords through coercion. The act does not cover fingerprints and biometric information, which gives law enforcers the authority to use them as means for getting information from criminal suspects.
Comments: David Baust had the right of protecting his privacy based on the provisions of the Fifth Amendment. It was legal for him to refuse to provide phone password that would have provided the suspected video evidence. The police officers did not have the absolute authority to coerce Baust to provide phone password. Instead, they would have used fingerprint sensors to get into his phones and get embarrassing items that could stand as evidence in the case. I support the final the ruling of Judge Steven Frucci because it is within the provisions of Fifth Amendments.
Facts: several mothers went to court in a bid to ask the court to overrule the decision made in 1977 that government workers could pay union fees. The decision allowed unions to ask for fees from the workers even when they disagreed with the position of the union that represents them. The Supreme Court decreed in favor of the plaintiffs citing that the targeted government employees did not require to pay any fees to the unions that represent them. The court addressed the category of partial public employees that has freedom of joining or opting out of a union or refuses to pay
