Write a 6 pages paper on the evidential argument from evil. A philosopher like Rowe and others have shifted from logical thinking to evidential, as logical does not prove that God exists, and there is

Write a 6 pages paper on the evidential argument from evil. A philosopher like Rowe and others have shifted from logical thinking to evidential, as logical does not prove that God exists, and there is a need for evidential proof that God does not exist. In that sense, William Rowe uses evidential arguments from evil to reveal that the existence of evil in the present world inductively supports the assertion that God does not exist. Therefore, we shall use Rowe, Bergmann, and Howard-Snyder's description of evidential arguments from evil to assess and candidly elucidate whether there is sufficient evidence in contrast to the existence of an all-knowing, infinitely benevolent, and all-powerful God.

Rowe contemplates that it is best for us as human beings to examine some specific kinds of evil that are existing in our world, and this made him select “intense human and animal suffering”. For that reason, Rowe claims that God does not exist as there is much suffering which an omniscient, omnipotent being could have devoid of without Him losing some greater good or allowing some evil equally to prevail. This is noticeably valid because Rowe had a rational reason as there is no fundamental reason, why God could permit gratuitous evil to prevail over the world yet He is capable of averting it (James & Bradley N.p). The traditional monotheistic has made us believe that God is loving and naturally good thus. individuals have found it difficult to comprehend the reason, why God will allow evil and suffering in the world. On the other hand, Bergmann and Howard-Snyders respond to Rowe’s evidential argument from evil by saying our miniature minds are incapable of comprehending, why God works the way he does. Moreover, our mind is incapable of telling why God hides Himself and nose-dives to provide relief to all this horrendous evil happening to us. Bergmann and Howard-Snyders oppose Rowe's point of view by claiming that God may have very good reasons for horrendous evil to exist. Therefore, Bergmann and Howard-Snyders claim that finite human reasoning has no rational justification to discern whether or not there are substantial reasons for why God permits evils.