Answered You can buy a ready-made answer or pick a professional tutor to order an original one.
You have the role of lobbyist for an energy company. Your organization has asked you to attend an energy conference in Washington D.C. There will be a number of U.S. Senators and Congressmen present a
You have the role of lobbyist for an energy company.
Your organization has asked you to attend an energy conference in Washington D.C. There will be a number of U.S. Senators and Congressmen present and you realize that you will have an opportunity to influence energy policy. As such, you have reviewed several reputable sources and have gathered a number of key facts that support your organization’s position on both hydropower and nuclear generation.
As a lobbyist for an energy company, you are pushing for less restrictive regulation. Notably, this should not be interpreted to mean that all environmental activists want increased regulation or that all energy companies push for less regulation.
No less than 350 words and no more than 500 words (not including the References list). Clearly convey the following:
- Two regulatory requirements, one pertaining to hydropower and one pertaining to nuclear power generation, that you wish to influence.
- How you believe these requirements should change.
- The facts that support your position, including how other countries have addressed these same issues.
- The long term benefits associated with your suggestions.
- @
- 2594 orders completed
- ANSWER
-
Tutor has posted answer for $10.00. See answer's preview
******** *** an Energy ********************** ********************* ************ one ** ********** *** *** ** ******* ***** ************* first ********** *********** ******** ** *** ********** ******* for new hydropower ******** The ****** ********** *********** pertains ** *** *************** ** nuclear ***** plants *** hydropower ** ***** **** ** see * ******** to *** ******* ** the ***** Water *** that ******* ** *** ********** ******* *** new ******** ***** ** ** ***** ************ we would like *** **** ***** ** ********* ** ** ***** ********* ** issue ******* *** new hydropower projects ******* ******* ******** **** *** *** **** **** **** ****** *********** ****** and ************ *** **** **** often ********* ******* approvalsFor ******* ***** generation ** ******* **** plant operators ****** only ** **** liable ** *** event of * severe accident ******* regulations **** ***** operators *********** *** *** ******** ** matter how ***** This ******* * *********** disincentive *** new ******* plants ********** *** ********* companies **** ********* and *********** ******** ****** ***** ** ** 2020) **** ********* ****** should be revised to ******* **** ********* *** ********* *** operators These *** two ******** regulatory requirements **** ** would like ** see changed ** ******* ********** ** *** ********** and nuclear ********* * ******* These ************ ****** ********* ********** ** ******* **** the **** ***** ** ********* ****** ** given ********* ** ***** ******* *** new ******** ******* ******* approval from *** *** **** **** **** ****** *********** delays *** ************ red ******* ******* ***** ********** we ******* **** ***** ********* should **** ** held liable ** *** ***** ** a ****** accident This will ****** * more favorable ********** ******* *** ********* companies ** ******** and ****** ** existing plantsThe facts ******* ** position There ** * ******* ****** movement towards the increased use ** ********** *** ******* ***** ********* **** China and ***** *** ****** *********** investments ** *** plants while also ******* more ********* ********** ******* ** ***** (Bigerna et ** ***** We ******* **** *** ****** States ****** ****** *** lead *** **** ** easier ** ****** in new ********** and ******* ****** **** **** **** ** **** our ****** needs while ******** *** reliance ** foreign ****** Long **** ******** ********** **** ** ***************** it ****** ** ****** ** *** ********** and ******* plants **** **** ** **** *** ****** ***** ** *** ***** **** *** have long-term benefits These plants are low-carbon energy sources ******* they ******* ***** ********* **** *********** sources **** **** or *** **** ** ********* ** ** **** to ****** *** ********* ** ***** ************ ******* changeThese changes ***** have ******* ******** *** *** ** ******* ******** ** ** ***** ***** they ***** ********* ********** ** new ********** *** ******* plants ******** jobs *** ******** *** dependence on foreign energy ******* Second **** ***** help ** **** our ****** needs ******* ********** emissions ** ******* ** fossil fuels *** finally they ***** **** the ** more *********** ** *** global ******* ** other ********* ** *** **** *** same restrictive regulations ******** ** ** ****************************** S ********** * ***** Polinori * (2021) *********** Power ********** ** ******* * ***** **** Analysis of *** ******* ** ****** *** ************* ************************ *** ******** ********* ***************************** *************** * ** * ***** * ***** **** * ****** ********* ********** ******* of * ***** hydropower ***** **** head‐sensitive ********* *** ********** zonesIET Renewable ***** *************** ********* doi: **********************