You must then post replies of at least 250 words (not to exceed 300 words) by 11:59 pm (ET) on Sunday Each reply must incorporate at least two scholarly citation(s) from at least 2 peer-reviewed journ

You must then post replies of at least 250 words (not to exceed 300 words) by11:59 pm (ET) on Sunday

Each reply must incorporate at least two scholarly citation(s) from at least 2 peer-reviewedjournal articles in the current APA format. Each source can only be cited once and must be fromdifferent sources to the main thread and the other reply. Any sources cited in the replies mustalso have been published within the last five years

Tendencies Quiz

My tendency quiz results have not changed much since the beginning of the semester. However, I took the quiz earlier in my career, and since then, my tendencies quiz has changed. When I first took it, I worked in healthcare and was in college; I leaned much further toward being egocentric, did not take criticism well, and was unwilling to listen when others told me. I have different challenges and am much closer to the middle. While I have moved away from being as far egocentric, I still have some growing to do and have worked to build confidence in my decision-making, which can sometimes come across as more egocentric. I am young in management, and if I do not make my stand and hold my confidence, I am sometimes seen as a kid still. 

Research Paradigms

At the beginning of the semester, my research paradigm focuses mainly on a qualitative or a quantitative approach. As the semester has gone by and we have reviewed more, I have become increasingly aware of varying paradigms and their foundations. Interpretivism helped to show that reality can be changed based on the person doing the research (Sanchez et al., 2023). Post-positivism helped me understand that research can combine facts and interpretations (Salzmann-Erikson, 2024). The semester has expanded my knowledge of research paradigms, from simple process paradigms to more complex multi-dimensional viewpoints.  

Christian Worldview and Research Process 

As a researcher with a Christian worldview, my thought process is heavily impacted by my faith and love for God. In the book of John, Jesus emphasizes knowing the truth and the impact that knowing the truth can have. I value seeking the truth without manipulating or distorting the data when researching (Knabb et al., 2022). The truth of the matter is essential and needs to be sought after. 

I firmly believe that in everything God gives us, we need to be proper stewards; a key aspect is the knowledge we have been gifted (Eom & Ng, 2023).  I aim to utilize humility when researching; research is not solely for personal gain. Research needs to be used to serve others and flourish in society. The book of Proverbs emphasizes that the Lord grants us wisdom, and it is our responsibility to continue to seek that wisdom. 

Areas of Bias 

All areas of bias are essential to keep in check, but a few that make up the top of the list are cultural bias, selection bias, and emotional bias. Cultural bias can occur when the researcher’s background plays a part in the interpretation of data (Cohen et al., 2023). The Bible tells us that people are created in God’s image (Genesis 1:27), and it is essential that researchers recognize the worth and dignity of everyone. My cultural norms are not for everyone and do not belong in my research. 

Selection bias is when one group is more likely to be included in the group than others, creating skewed results (Lu et al., 2024). The research must be represented by the population being studied. Emotional bias is another example that must be avoided; knowing how one’s emotions affect study and interpretation is essential (Theódórsdóttir & Höller, 2024). Researchers must remain objective to keep the bias in check. 

References

Cohen, R. G., Cooke, D. T., Erhunmwunsee, L., Krohn, C., Sudarshan, M., Wallace, A., & Moffatt-Bruce, S. (2023). Cultural diversity, bias, and patient safety: A case-based discussion. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 115(3), 555-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.10.026Links to an external site.

Eom, K., & Ng, S. T. (2023). The potential of religion for promoting sustainability: The role of stewardship. Topics in Cognitive Science, 15(3), 480-499. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12641Links to an external site.

Knabb, J. J., Wang, K. T., Hall, M. E. L., & Vazquez, V. E. (2022). The Christian worldview scale: An emic measure for assessing a comprehensive view of life within the Christian tradition. Spirituality in Clinical Practice. https://doi.org/10.1037/scp0000306Links to an external site.

Lu, H., Gonsalves, G. S., & Westreich, D. (2024). Selection bias requires selection: The case of collider stratification bias. American Journal of Epidemiology, 193(3), 407-409. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwad213Links to an external site.

Salzmann-Erikson, M. (2024). The intersection between logical empiricism and qualitative nursing research: A post-structuralist analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 19(1), 2315636. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2024.2315636Links to an external site.

Sanchez, J. I., Bonache, J., Paz-Aparicio, C., & Oberty, C. Z. (2023). Combining interpretivism and positivism in international business research: The example of the expatriate role. Journal of World Business, 58(2), 101419. Links to an external site.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101419Links to an external site.

Theódórsdóttir, D., & Höller, Y. (2024). Emotional bias among individuals at risk for seasonal affective disorder—An EEG study during remission in summer. Brain Sciences, 14(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14010002Links to an external site.