Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Your assignment is to prepare and submit a paper on analysis of of angie that dropped out of law school.
Your assignment is to prepare and submit a paper on analysis of of angie that dropped out of law school. According to Angie’s recitation of the facts, her Professor called her names which suggest that Angie is a spoiled and pampered child and would fail his class. At one point Angie arrived for class and found a poster on the classroom door which reflected the professor’s stated low opinion of her. At one stage prior to this, the professor’s disparaging remarks regarding Angie’s age elicited laughter from the classroom.
Not surprisingly Angie has been upset and discouraged by Kingsfield’s treatment of her and as a young person accustomed to academic success, she is very sensitive to his stated opinion that she is not up to the academic task at law school. She has been experiencing nightmares, sleeplessness and headaches as a result of her experience with Kingsfield and is currently receiving treatment from Dr Norman Miller.
Problem: The primary issue is the impact that professor Kingsfield conduct has had on Angie’s academic career. Angie, who has enjoyed academic success until now had high prospects of graduating from law school as quickly as she did from both college and high school. The fact is Angie has dropped out of law school as a direct result of Kingsfield’s treatment of her and her father wants to explore a course of action against Kingsfield in respect of the impact his conduct has had on Angie’s academic career and future career prospects in general. In order to substantiate a claim against professor Kingsfield for IIED, it will be necessary to prove that Kingsfield’s conduct amounted to outrageous conduct in the eyes of the law. . It is certainly not enough to merely show that Kingsfield’s conduct was insulting and upsetting. While it is not entirely certain what the courts will regard as amounting to outrageous conduct it clear that the courts will not award damages for IIED in every case that includes abusive or offensive conduct. (Yurick v.
