After reading the case summary, People v. Howard, if you were an Illinois state legislator, would you support a bill in response to People v.

1. After reading the case summary, People v. Howard, if you were an Illinois state legislator, would you support a bill in response to People v. Howard that provides that only conduct specifically prescribed by a state statute may be a predicate offense for official misconduct? Why or why not?Evaluate Van Itallie v. Franklin Lakes. Based on the facts described in Van Itallie v. Franklin Lakes, take a position and explain what you would have done differently, if anything, if you were the council members.

84607181. A predicate offence is an offence as a result of which proceedings have generated which maybecome the subject of an offence as described in Article 23 of UNCAC of “Laundering of...