Answered You can buy a ready-made answer or pick a professional tutor to order an original one.
Assignment 2: RA: Ethical Issues during Forensic Assessments
Assignment 2: RA: Ethical Issues during Forensic Assessments
When conducting forensic assessments, it is important for forensic mental health professionals to have a thorough understanding of the following:
- Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct Including 2010 Amendments
- Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychology: Adopted by APA Council of Representatives
Ethical issues are commonly present when completing forensic assessments. Read the scenario below and discuss the ethical issues therein.
Dr. Smith was contacted by the District County Attorney's office to evaluate Mr. Doe as part of a sexually violent predator civil commitment hearing. Dr. Smith agreed to complete the evaluation and contacted the prison facility, where Mr. Doe was being held, to schedule an appointment.
Upon arrival at the prison, Mr. Doe's attorney indicated that he wanted to be present for the interview and psychological testing. Dr. Smith agreed, and they proceeded with the interview. During the interview, while discussing his sex offense history, Mr. Doe admitted to offending against two adult females. He also reported offending against his three-year-old daughter. He indicated that his relationship with his wife, although rocky at times, is generally supportive. Upon inquiry, he reported a history of domestic abuse, which was never reported. He explained that due to his arrest and incarceration, his wife has had to find a job to be able to continue to afford their housing. He reported that he previously worked as a general maintenance worker at a local trucking company. He explained that he cheated on his wife with a coworker, who has since stopped all communication. He indicated that this coworker used to visit and send him letters and money when he was first "locked up." He reported that he was angry that she ceased all communication, without explanation, and spoke of her with rage and hostility. He said, "If I ever see her again, I'll kill her."
During the administration of the psychological tests, Mr. Doe asked to use the restroom once and was provided another five-minute break. There was a great deal of background noise throughout the interview and administration. On two occasions, Mr. Doe asked his attorney how he should answer the question. He was advised, and he answered as such. Upon the completion of testing, Dr. Smith thanked Mr. Doe and his attorney for their time and indicated that he would see them in court.
If released, Mr. Doe will return to his home with his wife and two daughters. He has reported to the prison staff that he will also return to his previous job and may enroll in vocational classes at an area community college.
Tasks:
As a forensic mental health professional, discuss the ethical issues in the scenario. Refer to the following resources:
- American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct including 2010 amendments. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx
- American Psychology-Law Society. (2011). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology: Adopted by APA Council of Representatives [Unofficial version]. Retrieved from http://www.ap-ls.org/aboutpsychlaw/ SGFP_Final_Approved_2011.pdf
Write a 5- to 6-page report in a Microsoft Word document addressing the following:
- Identify the appropriate APA ethical code(s) and the specialty guidelines that may apply to this scenario.
- Examine the limits of confidentiality. How might those limits be affected by some of the information contained in the scenario?
- Discuss specific circumstances in the case study in which there might be a duty to report or duty to warn.
- Explain the limitations of what the evaluator can and cannot say.
- Discuss the implications of the third-party observer to the overall evaluation.
Your report should rely upon at least four scholarly resources from the professional literature that are cited in APA format. The literature may include the Argosy University online library resources; relevant textbooks; peer-reviewed journal articles; and websites created by professional organizations, agencies, or institutions (.edu, and .gov).
Submission Detail
-
Assignment Component
Proficiency
Max Points
Identify the appropriate APA ethical code(s) and the Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists that appear within this scenario.
CO 1
APA ethical code(s) and the Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists identified are accurate for the scenario and cover all codes and guidelines present in the scenario. Specific examples of how they appear in the scenario are identified and completely explained.
/ 52 pts
Examine the limits to confidentiality.
CO 1
Limits to confidentiality are accurately identified and specific to the scenario. Specific examples and references to research are used to support ideas.
/ 32 pts
Discuss duty to report and/or duty to warn.
CO 1
Specific circumstances in which there is the duty to report and/or warn in the case example are accurately identified. All instances of appropriateness for duty to report and/or warn are discussed.
/ 28 pts
Explain the limitations of what the evaluator can and cannot say
CO 1 and 2
Limitations of what evaluator can and cannot say are accurately identified and clearly explained. Specific examples and references to research are used to support ideas. All limitations that are appropriate to the scenario are presented and thoroughly explained.
/ 40 pts
Discuss the implications of the third-party observer to the overall evaluation.
CO 1
Discussion of the implications of third-party observers is clear, complete, and thoughtful. Specific examples of how it impacts the evaluation and references to research are used to support ideas.
/ 28 pts
Write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; display accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
Writing is generally clear and in an organized manner. It demonstrates ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and generally displays accurate spelling, grammar, punctuation. Errors are few, isolated, and do not interfere with reader’s comprehension.
/ 20 pts
Total
/ 200 pts
- @
- 12 orders completed
- ANSWER
-
Tutor has posted answer for $20.00. See answer's preview
******* ****** ****** ******** ********************** ************** *************************** *** *********** *** ******* ********* *** *** forensic ********* guidelines **** *** apply ** **** scenario ** Ethical ***** *** ***** **** ******** *** an assessment ** a sexually ******* ******** *** main ***** **** is *** **** consideration first is whether ** not * ***** commitment ******* ** ********* **** **** is built up ******* must ** ***** ** as to present * ****** for ********** ** individual ***** ** be discharged once his **** has been ****** *** ****** ***** *** proper handling of *** rights ** ****** sexual ********** are *********** ** moral ********** and ******** ********* guidelinesAs from the ****** **** by ******** ************** ******* (2011) ********* **** ******** ************* ** *** ** *** ******** *** ethical ****** *** ******** ********* **** may ***** ** this ********* The other *** ethical ********* *** Forensic Guidelines ******* ***** ******** **** **** ** ********* **** ***** ************* *** services ********* Psychological *********** 2010) ******* Principle 505: ********** ********* ************* Association ***** there is **** *** **** to Warm ********* *** ****** of *************** ********* Psychology-Law Society 2011)In *** **** ******* **** *** make a difference ** * ********** limit ************* ** account ** *** *********** for supporting *********** ********* *** ***** ***** In *** ********* *** respondent **** **** he *** ***** ** * ****** his coworker ******* *** ************* ******* *** ********** *********** and ****** about *** **** ***** and *********** vibe *** ******** **** ***** * ever *** her again **** **** ****** ********* ** *** ethical ********* ** ** the Obligation ** *** evaluator to ******** *** ****** to the ******** authority **** to **** *** coworker that *** might be ** danger **** *** ******** ** *************** *** limits ** confidentialityIssues ** *************** *** ******** keeping ** **** that **** ***** forces *********** ********** points ** *********** ** ******** *** patients' ********** Nevertheless *** psychologist applies ***** standard concerning *************** ******* 2008) ** ** ** indicated by (Fisher ***** in early **** ************ ******** ** *** significance ** ***** ********* *********** ******* **** worried over the *** legitimate ******** *** ********** ********* from **** in **** ** *** * ****** ** ************ ********** ****** *** psychology ******** ***** ***** ******* ********** **** ******** ** moral ************ ******* 2008) ****** **** between 2000-2004 ** *** time **** *************** ************ *********** **** in ******** * ** *** ****** ** ********* *** ****** of *************** *** **** **** **** ************* that ***** will ** ************* ***** the analyst ** ******* ** ****** **** ******* your ****** or **** ******** ************ Center ******* case ** confidentiality ********** might **** it's **** if a ******* ******** risk ** his or *** ****** ** *** ****** ** ***** ***** ******* **** data will ** ******** accordantly ** the proper ****** *************** ***** *************** limits *** ****** **** of *** *********** ** ** ***** case because ** Doe ** * numerous ********* ** ******* sex ****** ** ***** ***** dangers towards his ****** ******** *** *** transparently *********** her *** *** *** ********* ********** ** **** *********** without *** offender's ****** The ********* ********** that *** ******** *** ****** cognizance about ****** ********* accordingly * ************* ******** Assessment *** *** ************ of **** **** ***** court request **** be ********** ** the ***** ******* particular ************* ** the **** ***** ** ***** ***** ***** be * **** ** report ** ********** ** warn ** Doe ****** **** his ******** ****** *** ************* without *** reasonable *********** *** ****** ***** *** with ***** and ********* He ********* ** *** ** he sees *** ***** ** **** **** *** As per the *** ****** ****** ******** ********* so the ********* would ****** *** coworker that *** ***** ** ** ****** ** ** ** ******** **** *** ********* ** al **** ***** **** **** **** ** **** apply ** the ************* in ***** case law ** statute ******** *** mental health ************ ** **** * good-faith ****** ** contact the ****** ** a ******** ******* ******* ** harm and to ****** law *********** of *** ******* *** ****** **** ************* *** ********** to ******* ******* that ****** **** ** ******* ** the ***** **** applies ** ********** ** ***** *** ****** ****** ************ has a legal ********** ** **** ****** ** ******* a threatened ***** ******** ********** ******* Benjamin & Werth ****** ** *** situation *** ************ ************* of ****** happening *** *** ***** ** fixation ****** ** ******* **** consideration The ******** ****** *** ** ********** *** questions ***** ******* ** ******** the questions with *** **** of *** ******** ******* ** * **** of any ********** *** psychologist has ** ********** ** ******* ** emotional ********** ********** ****** continuing *** ******** ****** ** ******* a ************ ******* before ***** ******** **** *** prison and ** ** ***** to ** ***** * ****** ** *** ******* parole ***** to ** ******* *** *** offender should ** **** ******************* *** limitations ** what *** ********* can *** ****** ******* ********** ***** require a ********* to ***** ******* however ******* ** ******* ** ******* ** ******** ********* ** what ** ***** **** *** ** state *** ** ***** ** ********** to ******** ****** ** per the ********* ** ******* *** psychologist ** ******** to hold *** ******* *** you even after ********* *** ended ***** ***** ******* ** ** *** thinks ***** *** *** ** ********* to any ***** ********** ******* your ************* * ************ is ***** to break confidentiality only ** *** ******** **** **** ** *** or ** **** commit the criminal *** ** the *********** claims ** **** ******* or ** the Psychologist ***** across *** **** ** ***** ***** ***** situations are ********** ** ********* is ***** **** *** therapist ****** ** ***** ********* ** ************* *** Implicit ***** ******** *** ******* ***** *** breaking ****** ** ******* ** doing ** **** appropriately **** **** *** ****** ***** * ******** ********** about **** **** occur **** *** **** he/she give *** also ********* the ********** ****** **** ** said ******** **** is ******** ******** in ************* ************ ********** ************** ******** **** Exposure: * ***** ********** *** ****** classified **** **** *** ******** assent ** *** hierarchical ******** the ********** ********************** ** ******* lawfully approved person *** *** benefit ** *** client/persistent ****** ********** by law" (American ****** *********** ***** ****** ********** ****** ******* data ******* *** assent ** *** ********** just ** ********* ** *** if * ***** ******** *** ******* ** *** ********** data **** is *** a rupture ** ************** the ************ ** *** *********** ******** ** the ******* ************* ****** **** acknowledged *** ******* ** any ***** **** ** ********** that *** **** ********* entirely and intensely ** ***** ** the wrongdoer’s best ******* ***** ** ***** *** **** ** ** information **** is ******* ** ** ********** ** *** ********* ******* **** *** ********** *** ** * ******* ** the *** ****** *** ************ *********** ** a ***** party *** ********** ** *** *********** ** ** ** **** for ******** or ************ ********** require that key ***** ****** be ***** ******* in **** *** *** **** to ****** *** patient *********** ******* with data ********** **** ************** *** written communication ******** ****** ****** ************* deals **** * *********** ************* ****** **** **** *** ******* or ******* **** is *** ******* While ******* ***** * ************ ****** to *** *********** ********* process *** primary **** of *** third ***** specialists ** ** attempt to *** * **** ************* ** *** individual who's **** dealt with ******* *** ********** ********** (2005) ****** **** ** **** ******** ** a ********** *** advancing his ** her customer's ****** were *** favored ** ** **** ** utilize * specialist ** *** *** confirmation and **** ********* to ******* * caseThe ******** ** ** ********** *** related **** *** analyst while ********* a ******* ********** trustworthiness particularly if the ******** ** a ****** ****** or ***** ********** ******* *** fact that outside ********** is not ******* ** is ************ ** ********* ** ****** ******** **** *** ********* **** People **** **** ******** ** ******* ************ on ****** ******** **** ** ******** ********** ** ********* (Gavett ***** ************** ***** ** ** assortment ** *** motivation behind *** outsiders *** *** ** ***** ******** ** ****** a ************* ********** ********** *** ********* *********** for *** patient/customer ** ** casual *** **** ** state things to him/her that **** ***** *** ********* **** ****** **** ***** to **** *** ***************** ******* ****** ** ******* as ***** ********** ** ********** is ******** **** ***** ***** *** instance ** ******** ** *** victim ***** ******** or a ****** *** be available during *** ********** ** the offender ****** **** is *** always recommended ****** *** McCaffry indicate *********** **** **** performing ****** in ****** ******** ** **** *** ******** in *** presence ** a ***** ***** (Gavett ***** ************** ***** *** numerous ******* *** ***** ******* *** not ** ***** ******** ** ****** * ************* ********** ********** ************ *********** *** the patient ** be casual *** **** to state ****** ** *** ** *** **** **** would *** ********* **** ****** It ** ****** *********** **** ******** should ** keep *** ******* ******* level ** ****** ** ******** Horwitz ***** ********* ********** **** “Past ******* **** ************ **** *** ******** ** * ***** ***** ******** is ******* ** ****** ********* ** ***** ** ****** ***** ************* learning *** ******* (Horwitz & McCaffrey 2008) *** ******** ** permitting * ***** Party **** be ******** by ***** proficient ***** *** ****** issues The *** ** **** practical information on ******** ********** ***** ***** ** ** **** *********** **** can ***** ***** *** ******** ******* ** **** *** ***** ***** presents can ***** to * ******* emotional ******** *********** ************ ** *** patient ** already ************************************************* * * & ********* * J (2008) ******* ** a third ***** observer and anxiety on ***** of executive ******** ******** ** ******** *************** ***** ************* * * ***** McCaffrey * * ****** The influence of an adaptation period in ******** *** ***** party ******** effect during * ****************** ********** Archives of ******** *************** 22(6) ***************** ****** **** Behavioral ****** ****** ****** on *************** ********* ** **** Jun **** from http://wwwneurofocuscentercom/limitations-of-confidentialityhtmlFisher * * ****** Protecting *************** ******* The **** *** ** ******* ******** model ******** Psychologist ***** ****** Jr * * ****** * R ******** * * H ***** ******* * * ****** ********* *********** Increasing ******* ***** the Duty to Protect ********* **** ************************************************** ************* *********** ****** ******* principles *************** *** **** of ******* ********* **** ******************* **** ********************************************** ************** ******* (2011) ********* ********** *** ******************* Adopted ** *** Council of *************** [Unofficialversion] ********* **** ********************************************************************