Answered You can buy a ready-made answer or pick a professional tutor to order an original one.
Business Ethics Conceptions, The Air Force Brake
Please refer to Announcement page,all information under Course Documents on Blackboard, and your syllabus for important case study instructions and submission requirements
1. Were any moral issues involved in Mr. Vandivier's decision to write up the final qualifying report? Explain.
2. In your judgment, is it morally right or morally wrong for a person in Mr. Vandivier's situation to write up a false report as he did? Formulate the moral standards on which your judgment is based. Do your standards meet the consistency requirement (that is, would you be willing to apply the same standards in other similar situations)?
3. In your opinion, would Mr. Vandivier be morally responsible for any "accidents" that resulted when pilots tested the brake? Explain your answer. Would this responsibility be shared with any others? Explain, with support/justification from the textbook and lectures.
Submission
Complete the assignment to the best of your effort and submit it on time. Follow the steps listed below to submit your assignment:
- @
- ANSWER
-
Tutor has posted answer for $30.00. See answer's preview
**** ****
*********
********* *********
*
*******
*****
******** ****** ***********
The
***
*****
Brake *** *** ***** ***** *** Preceding
**
February
****
***** *** no ****** governing
************
in
*****
********** ** ******* ***** ***** ********* **** ******* ***** **** *** ** *** 1960’s *** contract administration ******** * branch within the ******* was ********* *** *** ****** ** ************* *** ********* ************** ********** Project sixty as ** *** termed ****** ******* ******** ** *********** *** ******** agencies ******** ********* ** ********* assignments This **** ** ******** ******* ***** **** lead to queries of the morality **** ******** of dispensed contracts This incident ** * ***** ******* BF ******** *** not **** **
****
**** **** **** they acknowledged *** contract on *** ***** ** ******* ***** **** ******* ***** ** the ******** *** ******** this ******** ** additional ******* dilemma **** ethical ***** **** *** ********** a *********** ****** to reinforce ****** financial ***** *** ***** ************ ***** ** ****** ******* **** ******* ** ******** **** were ***** of *** ***** *** *** ******* ** uncover it *** ***** up *** not just **** with Goodrich ** was ********** ****
***
**** and ******* on *** team *** ********** characteristic ** *** **** ******** ** *** large ******* ** the ethical ****** ** **** *** ***** ** ********** ** ********* in * ***** *********** **** ***** page *** *** decisions **** ********** that **** ********* **** ** staffs **** inconsistent ** any ethical ********* **** ***** *** ******* involved *** ** remorse *** *** ****** *** ***** get **** ** the ****** *** ** their misjudgments and *********** *** Air ***** ***** #2 ** ** ******* incorrect *** ** ********** ** *****************
position
**
*****
up * false ****** **
he
***
*****
*** ** ******* statistics ** *** ****** the ******* judgment or ********** of the corporation ****** was ******** ***************** ********* ************ in ************ lives ** ****** plus *** ****** ** ************* ***** morality stand ** *** basis for ** ruling **** *** continuation ** the ****** *** ******* ***** It ** *** ******* to **** self-interest but if *** ****** ** ***** ******** ** **** ******* ***** *** * ***** ** enthusiastic to apply similar ********* ** ********* ********** *** if *** have done ********* what is ******* ***** it ** **** ********* **** **** ***** **** *** *** Force ***** #2 ** ** **** ** ********* ** morally *********** to *** accidents **** ***** **** ********
****
******
did
*** **** ** the brake
All
******* ******* about *** ********* report ** ** * *** *********** for *** ****** actions ** ******** the ****** as ***** ***** ** ********** ** their ******* **** ****** *** ******** ************* *** reheating *********** **** later ****** ** ******* the reports ****** ****** violated ******** ********* in *** *** to **** *** ***** ***** *** *** **** ***** ****** *** **** ******* ***** ** ***** ******** ** ******** ********** ** Mr ********* *** ***** ** *** serious ******* **** could ****** ** **** ******* ******* ** the ******** **** ** ****** come up
**
** ********* by *** ***** ** *** ********* ** **** Mr ***************** ****** ** inform *** ******** ********** of *** ************** **** he **** ** ******* the ****** It *** moreover Goodrich’s ************** ** not taking part ** ****** *** ********** **** **** **** to ***** ** *** 100 ****** per ****** above **** *** breaks *** ********** ******** ** be ******** *** ******* up all persons that **** ***** ***** **** issue ****** ** alleged *********** for any accident *** ******* ****** ***** to ****** on Mr
*********
********
Since
** made the ******** ******* ** to ******* ** the paperwork ** stand **** the truth When ********* ***** ******* ******* he would **** ******* **** *** ** it ****** *** ****** of possibility ***** the ****** *** a ***** ** **** **** important **** any *** Velasquez * (2012) ******** ethics: ******** *** ***** **** ***** Upper ****** ****** Pearson Works ****** Business ****** *********** *** ***** 7th ******* Manuel G ********** ********* Theodore M Jannaf ***** ********** Meeting ****** ** *** ***** ******* ******** ******* ******** *****
********
****
******
*
Defense
*********
***********
Center1980
****
****** *****
****
Related Phenomena *** ********* ****** ** ********** Casting ***********
