CHAPTER 28(1) SUMMARIZE 3 CASES (Case Start from page 591 to 596) (a) THE FACTS OF THE CASE(b) THE ISSUE AT THE LAW THE COURT IS CONSIDERING(c) HOW THE LAW WAS APPLIED IN THIS CASE(d) CONCLUSION OF T

**** ***** **** ********** V ******* ******* ***** ********** ** *** ******* case ** **** **** industries * ******* ******* ***** (MMG) ******** *** **** ********** ************* *** complainant **** **** ********** ****** ******* ******* ***** *** Salvador * Murillo ** ******* ** *** *** balances on *** two ********** notes Failure ** pay the ******** ** *** the ********** notes ****** *** **** ****** *** ****** *** ***** that **** ******* ****** *** ************ were **** *** ********* was to *** the ******* ****** *** *** date ******* to *** the ******** ** the ****** data was a ****** ** *********** *********** Besides *** ******** on *** ***** ********** **** *** *** $74329750 ** the ****** ********** **** **** **** ********** reveal that it received ******** ** which ******** *** ********* to be *** ******* ******** with *** ********* ******** **** ******** *** remaining ********* ******* ****** upon The facts of *** **** *** *** ********* *** ************* ** ******** ******* *** **** ****** on *** ***** *** second ********** notes ********* the borrower/maker ** ******** ** ****** *** **** presented ** *** ********* **** line *************** *** ****** ** consideringThe parties ***** ** ******* *** case ******* ********* The ******* ********* offered ** the ****** is **** *** failure ** ******* ** *** *** balance ** *** ***** promissory **** *** on individual ******** but ** on *** capacity ** MMG ******* *** *** ************ ****** ** the **** of signature ***** ambiguousness *** ****** ** this **** consider *** *********** ******* ** the first and ****** ********** **** *** ** **** indicate *** breach ** the *********** *** ******* during *** case ********* *** *********** ** **** case ********* *** ******* *********** to the caseThe court failed to ******* *** Murillo Modular Group *** ******* ****** as ** **** **** **** **** *** ********* ******** *** Murillo ********* ** ** ********** on *** caseConclusion from *** ******** ***** ********* ** failing ** dismiss Murillo Modular ***** and Murillo ****** It *** upon Murillo *** *** ***** to ***** *** ********** ******** **** ** *** ******* **** ****** *** ******** ********* ** *** ***** and second ********** noteCase 2Messing * Bank of ********** ***** ** *** ******* ******* ** the ******* ****** to ******** *** ***** ** the ***** ** *** problem **** arises **** ******* a non-customer ** *** **** of ******* fails ** ******* * thumb ***** as ************** ** the case ** sues *** **** ** ******* *** ******* to clear *** ***** ** the ******* ** provide *** thumb ***** It *** ***** for Messing to provide *** *** *********** ** ******** ** *** **** ******** *** **** he *** * ************ ** *** **** ** ** ********* * check of *** ****** **** ** *** ******* ** his ***** ** ** special relationship between *** **** *** ************* ** was ********* ********* **** Messing ******** **** the **** ********** ******** ** ****** ************ ** *** checkIssue the ****** ** **************** *** ***** **** consider ** *** ***** action to ******** the check **** ******* ******* ** ** *** in *** ******** ** ***** ***** ** *** *********** argument *********** *** check ** ***** ** *** ******* ** ********** about *** **** The **** will consider ******* the ***** print is * ********** ************** ********* under §3-501 If ** ** ********* the ******* of the **** ** ******** the ***** **** ********* ** ********** *** ***** **** ******** the ***** ** providing *********** ** *** ******** to be ****** ******** or ********** ** the ****** Consideration ** *** ***** of ****** ** the petitioner ******* *** ***** ** evaluated in *** *** **** *** court will ******** *** ***** of ****** **** the **** *** *** ************ *********** ** the ******* law was ******* **** ******** ** *** risks that the **** ** America ***** ***** ** *** *** ******* does *** ****** to *** later * **** **** ****** * ***** **** *** counter needs to ******* ****** **** *** ***** **** requires that the ******** ** ************ ****** **** **** ********** ** providing *** ******** ********************* **** *** courtThe ******** ** *** ***** ** special appeals ******** **** *** **** ** ******* *** *** ******** *** check by ******* ** ****** ** **** *** ******* ** *** ********* **** *** ********** ******** **** *** ************ ** the **** based on the risk ************ ****** V ****** ******** ******** IncThe Facts ** *** ******* **** involves *** ********* employee (Lee) and the ********* **** the ******** **** worth of ***** due ** ***** *** ******* ** sued the defendant *** failure to ***** *** ***** check ** paying it irrespective of *** ********* ***** on *** case *** considers *** *********** ** *** check and *** *** the holder ** the ***** by the **** of the ******** ********* to UCC ******* * ****** ** *** ******** **** ** ******** ** him ** ****** *** *** ***** **** arises **** ******* ******** that ***** holder *** *** ****** However *** drawee ***** ****** **** upon a ***** ** ********** ** or *** is ****** ** pay *** ****** if ***** ** *** ****** ******* *** check ** **** one **** *** check *** been endorsed **** ** **** ********* *** ******* ** the ****** **** ******* of the check ** *** ******** or endorse is *************** *** ****** ** consideringBased ** the ********* *** ***** *** an ********** ** *** *** ***** ********* to *** ***** ******* it is noted **** ***** transfer **** *** ***** to *** ********** is ********** *** *** ****** *** ****** ********** ******* it The consideration was **** ** *** ********* who *** *** ********** ******* ************** of *** ********** ***** enforced ******* *** ****** **** also **** *** holder ** **** case had ** ********** of * ***** against *** ****** ************ of ******* *** ****** **** anything for *** ***** ** *** ******** ** this **** the drawer *** * defense ********* against *** ***** ** *** draft ********* the ***** ********** *** holder *** *** ******** ************ ********** *** draftLaw application to the ******* ********* **** ** *** **** **** that *** drawer of *** ********** **** *** ***** ** the ****** ** **** the ***** ** the employee **** little ************* ** *** equities ** ******* ********* *** ******** ******* **** ** *** third ******* ****** *** ***** *** ****** ** ******* *** ***** ***** ******** *** ** defense to *** ************** ** the ******* ***** ********* by ******* **** the ********** required *** plaintiff ** recover *** **** ***** ******* *** defendant The ********* *** ********* required ** pay all ***** *** the ****** **** *** been ********* ****** ** ******* ****** the **************** ** case related ** ******** **** ******* ** ** ****** *** *** **** He purchased * ********* check **** amounted ** ****** **** the Bank's *********** *** *** ** **** **** ******** ** Edna McKinley *** ***** *** also payable ** *** *** the ******** family The ***** *** for * business *********** ******* MrBartel *** ******** *** it *** ******** to ** ********* ***** *** ********* safe ** *** ** ** **** ** ******** ** the ***** ** request ** ** ****** ******* **** *** death of *** Mckinley it *** found that *** ***** safe could *** ** ****** ** ********* ***** * **** ******* to ****** *** ***** ** ******** *** blind *** could not ******* a **** *********** of *** password The **** ******* the **** be drilled **** **** ***** ** was ********** **** the ***** *** *** ** *** **** ******* ** ***** *** ** located in the ******** ******* * few ***** ***** Mr ******** **** *** **** making ** **** ** ***** *** ***** In 2013 ** ***** * case against *** **** ** ******* *** ********** against his ***** Failure ** account *** *** ***** *** *** ***** reason ****** *** ***********************************************************************

Click here to download attached files: Law Tas1.docx