Commercial Law AssignmentPlease read the case study Scenario attached and answer the needed questions which are:1.Whether a contract was formed. If so, when was it formed and who were the contractin

********** Law ********************** * ******** is ******* ****** when one ****** ***** ** ***** *** *** ***** person accepts ** by ************* *** approval ****** ****** ** ** a ******* submission ** the ***** are ******* ** *** ******* and *** ******** ******* ******* **** ** ** binding **** *** ********* ** enforceable ***** such ************* *** *** calls for the ******** ** value ******************* that ******* *** ****** ** ***** *** ********** In *** end ***** party **** **** ********* ** ********** according ** the ***** set *** *** ***** under ************* ******* ** ***** ***** *** ******** ** **** ** ********** ** ** implemented entirely *** court’s intervention ** ****** *** ********* *** ************* fate will **** ** *** ******** ****** by *** ******** ** ** was *** **** **** ********* * ******* ****** **** ** * 35 *** ***** ***** in ***** ** the ********* ********* ***** ** ********** **** *** ********** ************* ***** *** ********* **** *** ************ silence *** acceptance but Bindley (the daughter’s manager) **** the ***** ** ******* ****** ***** offer *** ************ * Bernard Charleen ***** Damien *** ***** ***** **** arises ** **** ******** ** whether ***** ** * ******* ******** ******* *** ******* ****** *** the ****** ******** ******** *** Damien) **** ******* ** Alan’s ***** ** **** *** ********** *** textbook “Introduction ** ******** *** in ************ *** *** handwritten ***** According ** *** description ***** *** **** ******** that *** ******* *** ***** *** **** ******** *** **** ******* **** *** ****** After **** *** seen *** ***** **** **** ** ******** *** offer *** ****** to *** *** ***** ****** which **** promptly agreedIn the case ** ******* ***** *** ** ******** **** ** the counter ***** of ****** the **** and *** ***** ** **** *** ******** ** **** *** *********** **** *** **** ***** was ** ***** ******* ** *** **** *** ******* ***** ** $150 ******** the ******* ***** ** $200 ** Alan void **** ** contract *** ****** since *** agreement *** not ******* ***** *** **** no ******** ******* ******** *** *** ******* Alan as ***** was ** communication (oral or written) from *** **** of ******* accepting or rejecting *** ***** ******** *** *** ******* ** *** the **** *** the book *** *** ***** *** ******* from *** ******* when ********** did not ***** ** ********** ** *** ***** **** ********** *** existence of *** contract between **** ** ******* **** ******* and ******** ****** **** any ***** ****** on AlanBernard’s legal ******** *** remedies ********* to ******** law ***** *** ** contract formed ******* **** *** Bernard ***** *** **** ***** *** rejected as the ******** ******** **** Furthermore ****** *** already ****** an ********* **** **** ***** ******* was informed *** ******** ** ******* to **** Alan *** ******* **** *** ** ******* *** *** ********* was under ** ******* ***** ** this **** ******* *** ** ***** ******** since his ******* offer *** not ******** *** further *** money reached **** ***** ** *** ****** This case ** ******* ** **** of **** V Wrench ****** ** ** **** ** which ****** ****** ** sell *** **** ** Hyde at 1000 ****** but **** ******** **** * ******* ***** ** *** ****** which ****** ******** ***** **** ****** to ******** ****** with 1000 ****** **** *** ******** too He **** ****** *** ********* their ******** *** *** ***** upheld the ******** defendant **** ***** *** ** any **** ** ******** **** ******* ******* the two ** the ******* ***** **** *** ******** rendered *** initial *** ****** ***** **** However Alan *** ** ***** *** accepting *********** ***** ******* having ****** a ******** **** ****** ** ********* the money ** becomes liable ** ********* ******* with the ******** together **** the ***** Alan ***** him *** ******** only ******* ** **** *** argues that *** *** ***** *** ** *** book ** this **** Allan *** ******** the Sale ** Goods *** (SGA) ******* ***** which ***** for *** ***** ** ********** to *** description ****** in *** ********* **** is identical ** *** case ** ***** v ****** ****** * All ** 253 ***** Beale *** ********* ******** **** ** did *** ******* *** ***** *** ** ********* **** *** ********* Taylor The *** turns ** be * ********** of ******** ******** ***** **** *** ********** ***** **** ** **** *** ** full ********* ** this ** the case ** **** and Bernard ** ******* *** not ******* the ******** book as part ** *** offer **** he *** a ***** ******** ** ****** ************ ** the basis ** *** **** of ***** Act ***** **** ********** * remedy to **** ********* **** needs ** refund ** ***** **** of the ***** Bernard paid *** **** ***** ** * ************ of $100 Furthermore *** **** ** free at ****** ****** Education ** **** **** ******* should **** *** book **** ***** settlement ** ** least **** ** *** selling price ***** *** ***** **** ***** ** ****************** ***** Position and remedies The ********* ******* the *** ** unenforceable by law since the *** *** ********* In ******** *** *** principle **** ******* to **** ** ****** *** domestic ********* that **** *** ********** a *********** relationship between the ******* involved ********* ***** **** and ******** *** siblings ***** ** ** ***** ******** that ******** ***** ** **** ********* **** **** is ******* ** **** ** ******* v ******* [1919] 2 KB *** ** ***** Mr and *** *********** ********* ** be sending his wife *********** payment was ********** The ******* *** ******** ** ****** and left the *** **** ** England *** after ***** ************ ****** *** Balfour the ********* tried ** ** ****** ** ***** *** ******* but the judge ***** ** favor of the ********* ** ***** *** ** ******* ******** ******* *** *** ******** **** **** ** Charleen’s ***** ******** *** ****** **** *** ***** **** ** compel *** ******* ** fulfill the ***** ******* paying the ***** ******* * ******* **** *** **** of ******* v ******* ****** * *** **** *** ******* **** *** *********** **** *** ******* woman *** jointly ***** ***** *** * debt of *** ****** that *** ******* ****** ** ******* he would *** the **** ** Pounds per ***** ** help settle the **** ***** ***** ** ***** leave *** house to her After ** *** fully **** *** **** ****** * declaration of ****** owning *** ***** ***** was awarded ** *** court ** *** ******* of the ********* has been ** writing In relation to **** If ************ **** **** Alan **** ** ******* ** **** ***** ***** ** ******* *** a ***** action ******* ******** took *** *********** silence for ********** which ******** *** ***** ******* ** ******** *** **************** ***** ****** have **** ******** *** *** ******* **** the ******* In * ******* ******** Alan **** ************ money and never ******* *** *** material *********** ** *** *** ****** her of the existing offer **** Damien The Facebook **** ******* claimed that ** ******** a ****** *********** ***** ** reality ** got * credit **** ****** to misleading *** other ******* ** ***** ********* *** **** **** based ** ***************** **** ***** * legal ******** *** which ******** *** *** ** seek compensation ** ********* ********* in the ***** ********* ** *** **** ** ***** * **** ****** * ** *** *** plaintiff ****** **** ** **** ** obtain the highest bid ***** ** ******** *** **** ******** ** ****** the hummer ** *** ******** *** court ******* that *** defendant *** ******* ** ******** the *** ****** *** ****** ** *********** *** ********** ** ** ********** ** ***** ** relation ** ************ **** **** could **** ******** ************ offer before *** **** *** ***** ********* ** ***** **** conflict **** should ****** *** **** ** ******** as she *** not offered ******** ** ****** *** ***** are ** ***** ******* *** *** take to *** *** textbookDamien’s legal ******** *** *********** **** ******* ***** ** * binding ******** are ******** ** this case **** ******* ****** ** **** ***** and ********** as * ********* ** contract *** **** ******** ** ***** **** Damien ** ******* ** **** and **** ******* ** *********** there ** * ********* ** ********** as Damien **** the **** and Alan promises ** ******* *** ********* ** ****** 7 ******* ***** was * ****** of ******** ** **** ***** ** *** *** deliver *** ******** book *** ****** one he ********* **** the bookshop ****** ***** *** * ***************** ** his ********** ** ***** ** ** claimed to have ******** * ****** *********** ******* of credit This **** ** ******* ** **** ** ******** * Hurd ****** ** Ch D * ** **** *** plaintiff **** *** ********* a partnership ***** *** Pounds per **** *** ********* ******* ** *** information provided accepted *** offer **** *** **** amount only ** ******* that the ****** ****** *** *** ****** *** year *** ***** to ******* the contract ** *** ***** ****** *** ** ***** ** *** defendant basing *** reason on ***************** ** *** ***** by the ****************** *** **** of ******* v ******** ***** **** Co ****** * QB *** *** ruling *** ** ***** of ******* ***** *** ***** exactly what *** ******* *** advertised for *** to be ******** *** **** *** ***** diligently ***** times in * *** *** ** days *** *** ***** contracted influenza ********* she *** ******** ** * ****** ** 100 Pounds ***** the ********* refused ** *** However *** court ******* that Mrs ******* *** to be **** *** ****** ** **** as ** *** a ********** ***** ***** **** not require *** ******* to *********** ********** With ******* to Redgrave * **** *** ******* * ******** ***** **** ** **** is ** ********* ** ** ******** the *** of ********** ******** *** *** **** ** ***** *** ********** ******* *** ***************** of *** **** about *** grade he got **** may **** lured *** ****** ** ********* *** offer ***** ********** * ***** position *** ****** ** file charges against *** for ************ ** ******* ** ********* *** **** ** *** **** *** ***** on falsehood ** Alan *** ******* ** ** ***** ******* free at ****** ****** ********* the possible ****** ** **** conflict is ** ****** Damien ** ***** **** *** let him keep *** **** *** *** notes *********** ***** **** *** **** * ****** **** **** Damien ** ** liable to ***** ******* ***** *** **** ******* ****** custody ** *** ********* and a **** ****** ** *** ***** amount ***** ** ***************** and ****** of **** ** ***** ************** ******* Resolution ******* **** the ***** *** ** ***** ********* **** **** ******* and unenforceable agreements have constituted *** ********* ** place ******* ***** than *** legal process other **** *** ** ******** ** ****** *** conflict Negotiations can ** launched between **** and *** ** the ***** ****** ** **** **** it **** ** ********* and ** ***** ***** **** ** ******** The decision ** settle the ******* **** **** be ******* *** *** Mediation **** *** ** **** as ** *********** In this **** * third ****** **** ** ********* ** moderate *** ********* **** **** ** reached ******* *** ******** ******* ********* *** ******* ** **** This *** ******* ** Pepper * ****** ****** ** ** reaching ** agreement Lastly *********** can be *********** ** which * private judge **** ** present ** ****** a resolution Such a ********** have **** ************ **** ** ***** ***** ******** *** v IBM United ******* *** ****** *** ** ***** *** ******** ** *** disputed *** ******* ***** *** **** benefits ** *** is **** it ** ******** *** *********** ***** **** as **** ** ******** **** **** *** other ***** ** is **** ********* *** there ** the ********** ** ****** ********** *********** *** parties control the ******* *** ********* ********* *** ** ***** However **** approach ***** * precedence *********** *** ******* orders Lastly ** is ******* ** ***** ***** ***** ** ** **** cooperation ** the ******* ****************** Considering the **** **** *** ****** * ******** with ****** only ***** ***** **** ** ***** and ********** ******** **** ******* and ******* ** ********** while Bernard’s counter ***** was ******** However **** accepted ******** **** all the ***** but **** **** ****** *** ********* although *** ********* as ********* Charleen *** *** *** *** ********* ** *** ***** ***** **** ******** *** **** ** Goods Act *** further ************** *** facts ***** *** grades he ******** **** ***** * legal ******** *** *** *** ***** ****** ** general ***** ******** ** ******** *** **** not present ** all *** ***** **** making ** ********* ** take ***** ****** ******* **** ******** ** *** cases ** ******* *** Charleen ***** case ** a ****** *** ******** **************************************************************** * ******* ******************** ********* ** ********* **** **** ************************************************** v ****** ******************************** ********* 13 ********* **** from ******************************************************************* ***** ******** *** * *** ****** ******* *** (2002)Thompson ******* ********* *** ********* ** September **** **** ****************************************************************************************************************************************** * Carbolic Smoke **** Co ************************ ********* ** ********* 2017 **** ************************************************************************* * ******* ************************ ********* ** ********* **** from ******************************************************* v Wrench * **** ***** ******* (1840)Casebriefme ********* ** September 2017 **** http://casebriefme/casebriefs/hyde-v-wrench/Merritt * ******* ***************** ********* ** September **** **** ****************************************************************************** * **** *************** Retrieved ** September **** from http://swarbcouk/payne-v-cave-2-may-1789/Pepper * Hart (1992)E-lawresourcescouk ********* ** September **** from *********************************************************** * **** (1881)Case Brief **** Retrieved ** ********* 2017 from *************************************************

Click here to download attached files: Commercial Law Assignment.docx