Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Complete 5 page APA formatted essay: Scholarly vs Popular Media Focus on Psychology.Within academic community spheres, information is valid and reliable when its contents can be tested, verified, gene
Complete 5 page APA formatted essay: Scholarly vs Popular Media Focus on Psychology.
Within academic community spheres, information is valid and reliable when its contents can be tested, verified, generalized, and re-tested with an ability to achieve similar results. This may be different in society’s institutions like media, which may perceive information to be relevant and valid if it can satisfy consumer passion and thirst in the most appropriate way. However, does this indicate information and knowledge materials from one particular source or area can be regarded appropriate or inappropriate even when their consumption seems to be satisfying or unsatisfying? This is a question to be investigated by analysis of scholarly vs. popular media focus on psychology.
Kristin D. Neff and Pittman McGehee are two psychological authors of an article titled, “Self-compassion and psychological resilience among adolescents and young adults” published in 2010 (Neff and McGehee, 2010). The authors, through quantitative and qualitative research tools, show that self-compassion constitute an effective adaptive mechanism young people can adapt and develop in dealing with self and personal inadequacies and challenging life situations (Neff and McGehee, 2010). The research was carried out in a sample of 235 teenagers with a mean age of 15.2 and another sample of 287 young adults with a mean age of 21.1 (Neff and McGehee, 2010). Teenagers were drawn from private high schools in the southwestern city in the USA while young adults were selected from a college in the same city. Consent notice was first sent to teens parents before they were selected while young adults were selected based on subject pool and received course credit for participation (Neff and McGehee, 2010). The samples came from the middle class as per the social ranking while ethnic composition was as follows: children. 79% Caucasian, 7% Hispanic, 1% Asian, 13% mixed ethnic (Neff and McGehee, 2010). For young adults: 68% Caucasian, 9% Hispanic, 17% Asian, and 7% mixed (Neff and McGehee, 2010).
The measurement instruments used included 26-item Self-Compassion Scale that also included subscales of Self-Kindness, Self-Judgment, Common Humanity, Mindfulness, and Over-Identification (Neff and McGehee, 2010). .  .
