Compose a 1500 words essay on Social And Legal Aspects Of Computing. Needs to be plagiarism free!However, in this case study Susan failed to protect details of her group members by selling the data to

Compose a 1500 words essay on Social And Legal Aspects Of Computing. Needs to be plagiarism free!

However, in this case study Susan failed to protect details of her group members by selling the data to businessman and mishandling the backup information which was stored in a USB stick. The information was not available to the users since the database became in accessible and Susan misplaced the only back up that was available. Personal details should also be kept in such a manner that they will portray the accuracy to the users. To achieve this, it is vital for the data to be kept in a place where they cannot be altered without the consent of the owners (Theda &amp. Mary 2010). In the case study, Susan had written information which was irrelevant such as the details regarding the Caroline relationship with her former boyfriend Tom. Such information did not add any value to the information for the purpose it was intended for. Furthermore, Susan allowed another personal to use the data illegally which could result to its loss in authenticity. In addition, Susan forgot the secondary device in which the data was stored, and this created a loophole for other people to access private data which they could alter to suit their personal desires rather than the use for the benefit of the members. Question 2 The principle of data protection act requires that the individual information being generated should be just and legitimate (Theda &amp. Mary 2010). It is a legal requirement that such personal details should be obtained for a specific purpose only and not for any other reason whether legitimate or lawful. Susan violated this rule because she included private information regarding the relationship between Caroline and Tom (her former boy friend) and by adding that there relationship was not genuine, but a mere pretence just meant to hurt her. This information was not related to the reason for which the database of members was required. The regulations also require individual information regarding other people to be processed with their authority (Andrea &amp. Deborah 2011). The information held by one person on behalf of others is not supposed to be used for any other purpose apart from the one it was meant for. In this case, Susan shared member’s personal details with Peter for commercial use and in fact she received compensation of ?1000. This was against members wishes since they were included in the deal. Therefore, members are entitled to compensation for the illegitimate use of personal details. Personal details should be kept safe where they cannot easily be accessed by unauthorized parties, spoilt, or replicated (Andrea &amp. Deborah 2011). Susan violated this rule by carelessly sharing information with other people which eventually caused blockage of data maintained in the members’ website. She also misplaced the backup gadget which contained member’s details and probably the gadget was taken by other people. Those people who took that gadget probably went ahead and abused the information contained in it for their personal gains. This denied the group members the right to protection of their personal details which may result to abuse of their details. Question 3 In the case study, Peter replicated the data massively and sent numerous email messages to the clients.