Compose a 2250 words assignment on humanities/ sociology. Needs to be plagiarism free!

Compose a 2250 words assignment on humanities/ sociology. Needs to be plagiarism free! Adler as a perrennialist believed that it is vital to educate young people in things that would be important in the long-term to everyone, everywhere (Adler, 69). It was Adler’s belief that it is these important topics that improve a person to become a better version of them and this vital topic is philosophy. Philosophy, according to Adler teaches principles and not facts. Facts entail details that change over time but principles focus on people. Adler believes that everyone was born with the same information, information we consider basic. Even though this information was there at birth, it was hidden and it is through discussion sessions with his students that this hidden information came to suffice. Adler developed a system of education that was based on the classics that was adopted throughout America. He believed that education is meant to focus on prominent works and thoughts that have been there throughout generations and recurs with each generation (Adler, 314). These works can only be taught through the study of philosophy. He believed these past works and thoughts were so profound that they have stood the test of time and are relevant in the present as they were at the time of their conception. Week One Question 3. According to Young, “we can learn from art because the admiration of art is a cognitive process.” Works of art perceived to be very good provide to its admirers knowledge about the universe (young, 86). A person’s engagement with art brings out emotions which in turn produce activities that facilitate the acquisition of knowledge. Good artwork produces great insight and knowledge that cannot be summed in to a propositional language. Even though both Plato and Aristotle agree we can learn from art, Plato believed the knowledge acquired was detrimental while to Aristotle, it was of value. Philosophers like Aristotle argue that both poetry and fiction have a way of engaging the emotions of people in a way that is seen as valuable and not detrimental. Plato suggested that when one indulges in the emotions brought about by some form of art, they are likely to experience an unbalanced soul that can lead to them having bad character. David Novitz believes there are three claims of knowledge concerning art .First claim is of what we know about the art and the imaginary world represented. The second claim is of what we believe to be the emotion response warranted for that art. The third claim is of the information we think the art provides about the world. It’s therefore easy, according to David, to be misled by art. He believes that emotions evoked by a piece of art should be based on our broader knowledge of the world (Sarah, 72) Eileen John believes art arouses moral knowledge. In his first argument, he argues that art presents to us examples of moral activities. Eileen argues that art presents situations that we rarely experience in our daily lives. Simulating our reactions to these works of art helps us get an idea of our future responses to same situations. In his second argument, Eileen claims that we can acquire essential moral knowledge from works of art. Works of art give us imaginative access to experiences relevant to moral judgment (john, 134). Week Two Question 1 Education has no meaning unless it has helped you understand life in its expanse (Wilson, 186).