Compose a 750 words essay on Environmental Studies, Ethics. Needs to be plagiarism free!Large-scale farming is more complicated than large-scale industry. Also, the growth pace is very slow. To Karl M

Compose a 750 words essay on Environmental Studies, Ethics. Needs to be plagiarism free!

Large-scale farming is more complicated than large-scale industry. Also, the growth pace is very slow. To Karl Marx, capitalism meant a progressive historical stage that would eventually freeze because of internal contradictions, and in the end, making way for socialism. This ideology provides the base for Marxist theory on the impact of capitalism and mechanization on farmers, the transition from peasant-based agriculture towards an agricultural-industrial revolution.

The need for revolution was inevitable. The conventional means of agriculture just could not feed the mouths of billions of people. The impact of this revolution cannot be categorized as either good or bad in absolute terms. The peasant domestic industry was the backbone to the system providing protection for laborers. But with the transition this industry vanished and with it the traditional peasant culture. For the same reason, people started to see the benefit of having a small family, which meant fewer mouths to feed in the winters. The need for more money was the primary driving force.

Marxs idea about agricultural revolution is defined within the comparison of large-scale farming versus small-scale agriculture. The assumption here is that the rural population will be segmented into strictly defined social classes. a small minority of wealthy farmers living alongside the majority of agricultural workers. This relationship would not be based on equality because the workers would have been always trying to free themselves from the oppression and influence of the authority. Marx proposed the success of transition but suggested that an alliance of industrial and agricultural working class was imperative for the healthy growth of the society. Ultimately, this union could become a force against the capitalists.

Kautsky does not limit himself to a narrow debate. Only considering the