Dawkins and Hart hold views that are fundamentally contradictory. Whom do you find the more convincing writer and why?

Dawkins and Hart hold views that are fundamentally contradictory. Whom do you find the more convincing writer and why?

I had to read, "the God delusion" by Richard Dawkins and "the expericence of God" by David Hart part I and part III.

I was wondering what others thought of this question