Hello, I am looking for someone to write an essay on Critique for Article by Caelin Briggs about Civil Society Consultation in Emergency Relief. It needs to be at least 750 words.Download file to see

Hello, I am looking for someone to write an essay on Critique for Article by Caelin Briggs about Civil Society Consultation in Emergency Relief. It needs to be at least 750 words.

The work is well structured, with clear headings and subheadings, proper use of numbering (bullet points, etc.), paragraphing, and sentence construction (Briggs, 2011:3). The author has also provided meanings of all the acronyms used so that readers can relate to the subject matter in the easiest way possible. From the first paragraph, it is easy to tell that the author is keen on clarity and presentation. The abstract is an excellent summary of the paper since readers can decipher the author’s message just by reading the abstract. The author uses the abstract to provide a short yet precise representation of the whole paper, as is recommended in scholarly works.

The background and research problem are well-developed and articulated. Just like the abstract, the background acquaints readers with the paper, giving them a sense of familiarity that facilitates comprehension. The literature has been comprehensively reviewed, although the author could have included more information due to the intricacy of the subject. The literature is well-reviewed, but it still feels like some aspects have not been covered as well as they should be. The complexity of the subject demands a detailed and explicit literature review to familiarise readers with the history of the topic, and it seems like the article has fallen short in this regard (Briggs, 2011:41). The literature review conducted is not sufficient to make a sound connection between past studies, current studies, and the author’s work. The research problem lives up to the content and objectives of the paper. It is precise, clear, and relevant, and has been effectively polished into a hypothesis. The author supports the paper with relevant and up to date sources that give the paper credibility and make it look well researched. The author has also used sources that are commensurate with the length of the paper. The number of sources used is sufficient for this type of paper. However, the paper could have done with more sources to further enhance its credibility.