Hello, I am looking for someone to write an essay on New York State mental hygiene law- the need for involuntary medication. It needs to be at least 2500 words.Download file to see previous pages... O

Hello, I am looking for someone to write an essay on New York State mental hygiene law- the need for involuntary medication. It needs to be at least 2500 words.

On one hand, those who oppose involuntary medication argue that it goes against the patient’s right to autonomy and self-determination. those who support the practice also argue that its use is for the best interest of the patient and the bigger population. This essay shall discuss this issue, arguing both sides of the issue, and taking a stand or position on the debate, while also discussing the counterarguments to the position taken. Body Involuntary treatment is defined as medical treatment administered to the patient without his consent. In most cases, this treatment is seen in mentally ill patients especially those who are deemed by the court or by mental health professionals as dangerous (Kallert, et.al., 2011). Individuals with mental health illnesses are generally attributed the same right as other patients to self-determination. However, this has not always been the case. For many years, individuals with mental health issues have been struggling against a negative stigma about their competence and their safety in society (Kallert, et.al., 2011). At present, the negative stigma has been questioned by health professionals who argue that mental illness does not necessarily imply an inability to make sound decisions. Involuntary mental health treatment can be applied in numerous contexts. The most common is the court-ordered commitment to inpatient mental facilities. It also includes the involuntary medication as imposed by mental health professionals and treatment imposed for specific prisoners who may indeed pose a danger to themselves and others (MHA, 2013). Mental illness is hardly a crime. however, there are times when individuals suffering from mental illness manifest unfavorable and illegal behavior (Freckelton and Petersen, 2006). Violations carried out by individuals with mental illnesses can come about in various ways. The mental condition of an accused at the time the act was committed is an essential element in proving intent (Freckelton and Petersen, 2006). Whether or not the accused offender during the commission of the offense was able to distinguish between right from wrong can be considered in the determination of his case. Kendra’s Law has been implemented in New York since 1999. This law ensured the involuntary commitment and treatment of individuals following court determination of the mental illness, even without the consent of the individuals deemed mentally ill (Carpinello, 2005). In general, this law has been able to secure significant benefits for the patients and for the general public’s safety. In fact in a long-term study published in the Psychiatric Services journal (Phelan, et.al., 2010), significant benefits in assisted outpatient treatment has been seen. The study also found that the group not receiving AOT was twice likely to be arrested as compared to the group who received it. For those receiving AOT, the possibility of any arrest was at 2.66 times greater before their participation than after (Phelan, et.al., 2010). Finally, for those undergoing AOT, the possibility of arrest for violent offenses was 8.61 times higher before their participation in AOT than after. It is important to apply involuntary treatment for patients who present a danger to self and others. In the case of Washington v.