Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Hi, I am looking for someone to write an article on the debate surrounding the standard and the non-standard english language Paper must be at least 1250 words. Please, no plagiarized work!
Hi, I am looking for someone to write an article on the debate surrounding the standard and the non-standard english language Paper must be at least 1250 words. Please, no plagiarized work! It is due to this reason that David Wallace holds the view that we “can't escape language: Language is everything and everywhere: its what lets us have anything to do with one another” (Wallace, 41). It would, therefore, be important if all English language variations were treated as important languages for social application, as opposed to holding them as inferior to the Standard English language. Nevertheless, there is a need to accept that the Standard English language is the basis for the other English variations that have developed, meaning that learning its usage and proper application is essential. This is simply because it is the language mostly used in different forms of formal communication. However, Curzan seems to hold a different opinion of Standard English language altogether, by holding that “Standard English and prescriptive grammar are about who has the social power to prescribe and who is silenced in the process” (Curzan, 877). This essay, then, aims to argue that the Standard English language is not superior to non-standard English language.
According to George Orwell, “Modern English, especially written English, is in bad shape (Orwell, 1). Therefore, Orwell observes that there is a need to take the necessary trouble to rectify the bad modern English language. However, despite the fact that Curzan does not object to this idea, she is of the opinion that it is not often good to emphasize more on the usage of the Standard English language and its prescriptive rules of grammar, just for the sake of preserving the Standard English language in its originality. The argument here is that it is rationally dishonest “to pretend that written Standard English is above question” (Curzan, 871). Her recommendation, therefore, is that students should be given room for challenging the rule of Standard English language, without being perceived as if they are being over ambitious or as .though they are breaking a sacred rule. .
