Hi, I am looking for someone to write an article on why science cannot be fully trusted Paper must be at least 1250 words. Please, no plagiarized work!

Hi, I am looking for someone to write an article on why science cannot be fully trusted Paper must be at least 1250 words. Please, no plagiarized work! Knowledge may end up being characterized as “findings” that have not been critically analyzed and which are fundamentally flawed and inaccurate. For example, in 2013, Amgem discovered that only 6 out of 53 studies on cancer research could be replicated while others varied widely from previous research. This trend has been observed in several other instances where scientific findings that have been assumed factual cannot be replicated suggesting that there is a laxity in verifying studies and that scientific methods are imperfect and prone to theoretical or human errors. Because of its vulnerability to defects stemming from human error, science should not be entirely trusted since it can mislead people if they do not query and verify every single claim.

“The success of science for the last few centuries has been so great that we have come to equate science globally with the truth” (Bauer 10). Consequently, people tend to assume that anything that has been “discovered” or “proved” is unequivocally true. Among the primary causes for the inaccuracy of scientific studies is the fact that scientists longer draw motivation from science, for its own sake but rather the results of their work and how they will be pictured by society. For example, if a scientist wants to prove a hypothesis, they are likely to be motivated by the impact this new knowledge will have on the world, their personal and career life instead of the process of proving if they are wrong or not. This misguided motivation can be attributed to several factors. the most notable one is competition in the job market. The scientist has to “sing for their supper” in a corporate-dominated world where most leading scientists are funded and sponsored by corporate bodies with a covert agenda. Instead of telling a scientist to discover for instance if element X in GMO causes food to become toxic after a month of storage, the scientist may be hired to find the proof that it does not.&nbsp. Given the competition for grants and sponsorships, many scientists have jumped into the corporate bandwagon and they work to produce specific results based on the desires of their employers.