Hi, I need help with essay on A Cog Laboratory : Cognitive Psychology Signal amplification. Paper must be at least 1250 words. Please, no plagiarized work!Download file to see previous pages The targe

Hi, I need help with essay on A Cog Laboratory : Cognitive Psychology Signal amplification. Paper must be at least 1250 words. Please, no plagiarized work!

The target of this report is to impacts skills on the students concerning the effects that frequency installs in the signal amplification. The students would correctly be able to identify from the different frequency boxes how the boxes directly influence the signal amplification. Previous studies of signal amplification carried out by Brennan and Leape (1965) tried to explain the impacts that frequency has on signal amplification. Since the boxes present in this experiment have been assigned different frequencies (random frequency boxes) from which the students have to identify the amplification of the signal between the two stations that is station A and station B. Other recent studies on signal amplification done by Bates and Boyle (1998) tend to explain the difficulty that the signal amplification experiences having been subjected to different frequency boxes. This experiment suggested that for the amplification of the signal, the signal frequency plays a major role. The signals from the different frequency boxes at times undergo smooth amplification while others experience some technical issues during the amplification. Some of the technical issues due to the frequency boxes were beyond the scope of this experiment and therefore the students could not obtain correct observations. With the possibility of the technical issues described above in this subject pertaining to the task on hand, it can be deduced that the presence of the obstacles might lower the amplification of the signals. The amplifications of the signals on the other hand interfere with the amplitude of the signals as viewed on the screen of the Cathode Ray Oscilloscope. The higher the amplification, the higher the amplitude. Method As stated earlier, this experiment put into consideration the identification process for the presence and absence of the certain obstacles in the line of the amplification. The subjects were visible on the cathode oscilloscope screen. The obstacles were placed on the different frequency boxes path and the amplification devices. Almost half of the amplification trials had different frequencies at a time. The different boxes were arranged in a given pattern in line with the amplification devices. The different amplification devices were placed in line with the different frequency boxes. All the possible responses of the amplification devices were categorized into four different groups. If an amplification device detected the presence of the frequency box then it was indicated on the screen. The output on the screen was labeled as positive. On contrary, the failure by the Cathode ray oscilloscope to detect the amplification on the screen then it was labeled as negative. In a situation whereby the complete amplification was not shown on the screen and indeed they were not projected were labeled as right rejections. A failure by the cathode ray oscilloscope to detect the amplification process and indeed it was present was identified as faulty. Figure one below shows the visual representation of the amplification response. After the completion of the trial test, the different frequency boxes were presented with a report which was their results from the test. The values obtained from these experimental data were transferred for use in the next section of the experiment.