Hi, I need help with essay on Compare the views and coverage of two historical newspapers on the 1932-1933 Roosevelt/Hoover presidential campaign and elections. Paper must be at least 1250 words. Plea

Hi, I need help with essay on Compare the views and coverage of two historical newspapers on the 1932-1933 Roosevelt/Hoover presidential campaign and elections. Paper must be at least 1250 words. Please, no plagiarized work!

For instance, the two newspapers (The New York Times and The Oregonian Newspaper) seemed to align themselves in the perception that the Republicans, even though they were at the helm, the Great Depression, happening on their watch, ruined their structured campaign promises, an issue that the Democrats exploited by promising a new era of prosperity.

An incisive look of the operations of these two newspapers and their impact on the United presidential elections may trace back in their later years of analyzing the climate of the country before the 1932-1933 elections. Their impact was so huge, aiding individual opinions, hence creating what was described as the ‘formidable wave of change’ (Forward With Roosevelt). Later on, there was an overwhelming Democratic Party victory, something that, even the unpredictable OregonianStar, had to settle for (Muldoon). The New York Times had taken its stance that Americans needed change since it had reached what they described as ‘intolerable impasse’ (Register And Vote Democratic).

The diction running through the editors of these two historical papers largely had a lot to discredit Hoover’s term as the president, and one can conclusively say that they were not for his re-election. One column shared by both the Oregonian and the New York Times pointed that the people had faced a harsh reality. They reported that citizens did not only have to deal with the painful strain of depression, but also expressed disgust towards the ineptitude of the government of the day not doing enough to save the country (Mapes). One does not need an explanation to conclude the side with which the editors had inclined to. But as Seatte Star would put it, Hoover gave the Republicans a hard time in nominations for he felt obligated to run again for the top office so as he could at least vindicate himself. So, Hoover, was never chosen, but rather he imposed his