Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Hi, I need help with essay on Religion/Worship. Paper must be at least 500 words. Please, no plagiarized work!A prison may limit a prisoner’s capability to observe absolutely to a certain tenet of h
Hi, I need help with essay on Religion/Worship. Paper must be at least 500 words. Please, no plagiarized work!
A prison may limit a prisoner’s capability to observe absolutely to a certain tenet of his religion provided that the prison has sound penological interests reinforcing the restriction, and provided that the interests surpass the prisoner’s religious interests, then the limitation does not violate the First Amendment (Harr, Kären, Christine, 2012). Right at the outset it is essential to note that jails and prisons that embrace federal prisoners place themselves under limiting federal law of Religious Land Use of Institutionalized Persons Act, which avails protections for the protections rights unless the prison/jail present a compelling state interest in denying the rights (Gaines & Roger, 2013).
Inmates in jails and prisons make all sorts of complaints grounded in the freedom of religion. There are numerous cases based on a complain that the has declined to avail religious meal. complaints grounded in the claim that the jail has declined to avail religious materials. and, accusations grounded in the allegation that the jail is limiting a prisoner’s right to worship (Cole & Christopher, 2008). The suitable legal standard governing inmate religious claims remains a source of heated debate (Cole & Christopher, 2006). In the past few decades, the legal protections of prisoners’ religious freedom have been subjected to a dramatic series of ebbs and flows. Presently, inmate religious claims within the state and federal prisons reviewed under strict scrutiny.
In the case Lewis v. Sternes, #11-3297, 2013 U.S. App. Lexis 6154 (7th Cir.) a prisoner declined to have a hair cut citing a “Nazarite vow” in which he claimed that the haircut violated high right to religious freedom. The federal court ruled that the “Nazarite vow” was optional instead of a compulsory observance of his religion. In another case of Sisney v. Reisch, #10-3003, 674 F. 3d 839 (8th Cir. 2012), the federal court,
