Hi, need to submit a 1000 words paper on the topic Ethical Considerations Project. Brownfield v. Daniel Freeman Marina Hospital.

Hi, need to submit a 1000 words paper on the topic Ethical Considerations Project. Brownfield v. Daniel Freeman Marina Hospital. Additionally, the Catholic theologies also argue that in consequence of informing the rape victim about emergency contraception shall held the hospital and the physician correspondingly culpable for any undue action of the victim (Smugar, Spina, &amp. Merz, 2000). On the other hand, when considering the patient’s right to truth as well as freedom to select their healthcare preferences, the ethical and religious directives bind the Catholic hospitals in informing the rape victims when serving emergency contraception as a measure of pregnancy prophylaxis. In this context, the 26th directive of the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services (5th Edition) postulates that “The free and informed consent of the person or the person’s surrogate is required for medical treatments and procedures, except in an emergency situation when consent cannot be obtained and there is no indication that the patient would refuse consent to the treatment”. Under this particular directive, even though the Catholic hospitals can be deemed as not bound to obtain an informed consent from the patient when delivering emergency situations, a critical evaluation of the rule advocates that such actions shall only be justified where the patient deciphers or has no reason to decipher a refusal to the rendered treatment (United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, 2009). Thus, based on these ethical considerations, where the plaintiff in this case had a possibility to refuse emergency contraception, the Catholic hospital was bound to take her informed consent.