Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
I will pay for the following article A Point of View on Art. The work is to be 1 page with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.
I will pay for the following article A Point of View on Art. The work is to be 1 page with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. There are different points in the view presented by Tolstoy. The view regarding the importance of the representation and expression of culture and morality in the artworks is a very important aspect of viewing the significance of art. This can be attributed to the fact that the artworks being a product of human being’s creativity and experiences can ultimately represent his true nature. Culture and norms encapsulate the experiences of human beings. Thus, what Tolstoy expressed in his view is correct.
On the other hand, the definition of art cannot be limited by the number of people who can relate and appreciate the price of the artwork. When he Tolstoy said that the best part is the most widely accessible art because it can better communicate with the audience, he limits the capability of the people who observe the artwork to realism. He is right about the subjectivity of beauty but he can be wrong because his view stressed the failure to recognize that viewing art is subjective. Even the culture and morality that he is using as a guideline for his judgment can be subjective.
In conclusion then, if Tolstoy is right about judging that the best art is the most widely accessible ones, why do surrealists and other unconventional artists still being appreciated? It is because their works also mirror the realities of life. Every product of human creativity on a personal point of view represents culture, thus, even in the absence of beauty or reality in the picture that is painted, it is still considered as art. Being the best or the worst art is judged only by the subjectivity of the beholder.
Works Cited
Wolff, Robert Paul. About Philosophy. 8th ed. Prentice-Hall, 1999.