Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
I will pay for the following article Misperception is Reality: Understanding the Hoover/Roosevelt Policy Continuum. The work is to be 8 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a r
I will pay for the following article Misperception is Reality: Understanding the Hoover/Roosevelt Policy Continuum. The work is to be 8 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. It’s tempting to categorize the people who make laws and run our government as “conservative,” or “liberal” because, among other things, doing so makes it easier to assign blame when policies go wrong – in spite of good intentions. Ill-conceived perceptions are often the result. Inaccurate notions become stronger over time until they acquire the gloss of truth. So it has been with the comparisons made between Herbert Hoover and Franklin Roosevelt and the policies enacted by both administrations in response to the Great Depression. The clash of laissez-faire economic philosophy and government intervention, a debate which has dominated the American political scene in recent years, provides an interesting subtext to the study of pre- and post-Depression America. A reassessment of that era by economists and historians has revealed that the Hoover administration was far more dynamic than is generally assumed and indicates that Hoover and Roosevelt had much in common, ideological differences notwithstanding. It can be said that the New Deal inherited and extended programs initiated prior to 1932. History has painted Hoover as a conservative whose overtly conservative economic philosophy was aggravated conditions that led to the nation’s economic collapse. This perception has its roots in Hoover’s tenure as secretary of commerce in the became a backward extension of the highly negative images now associated with his presidency. He was the very embodiment of the illusions and complacencies that had led to economic and social disaster, a man…who had turned himself into a tool of entrenched greed and special privilege…”.
