Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
I will pay for the following article The Treaty Provisions Between European Union and European Court. The work is to be 6 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.
I will pay for the following article The Treaty Provisions Between European Union and European Court. The work is to be 6 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. The conflict first emerged in 1963, in the case of Van Gend en Loos v Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen. . The Court established that a conflict between EC law and national law was possible. The Treaty establishing the European Community states: “Any natural person may….institute legal proceedings….” in a decision which involves him even indirectly. This raises the issue of the role of the ECJ in terms of the supremacy of individual nations and the need to institute specific provisions delineating its role as the enforcer of community law. But recent trends indicate that the ECJ is not perceived to be playing a nonactivist role. According to a German Court in a recent decision. “I deeply regret that the court refuses to participate in a constructive way to establish European solutions. In the case of Van Gend, the Court did not confirm which would prevail – EU law or national law. But in the case of Costa v ENEL, the Court stated that European law would prevail, thereby taking up an activist posture. In the case of Internationale Handelsgesellschaft, the ECJ stated: “The validity of a Community measure….can not be affected by allegations that…..it runs counter to….. as formulated by the constitution of that state or the principles of a national constitutional structure”. Thus the issue of the primacy of EU law has been established by the ECJ in accordance with the general principles of Community law rather than as an independent regulatory authority that conducts judicial review. In the case of Costa v E.N.E.L., the Court held that the EEC Treaty had created its own legal system which “became an integral part of the legal systems of the member states and which their courts are bound to apply”. The preferential position of Community law in the internal legal order is mandated by the economic constraints generated by the Common Market. By virtue of the Direct Effect, member States are now obligated to comply with Community Law as it has been framed according to European laws within the framework of their own internal laws. In fact, no room has been left for partial measures or partial implementation.
 .  .  .
