I will pay for the following essay Abolition of Capital Punishment. The essay is to be 9 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.Download file to see previous pag

I will pay for the following essay Abolition of Capital Punishment. The essay is to be 9 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.

On the other side are those that the first side calls the "abolitionists", people like this writer who are against capital punishment and who want it abolished. This paper explains the reasons why capital punishment must be abolished, analyzing and explaining the opposing views in the hopes that such a position is objective, reasonably justified and supported.Undoubtedly, the question as to whether it is right and just to take away the life of a human being, no matter how wretched or criminal, is an issue that contains a high degree of intellectual and emotional content. This is an issue that affects us all, and the materials available on the topic are charged with a load of subjectivity, unavoidable because individual and collective perceptions differ on several key points of the issue, and concepts such as "justice", "punishment", "heinous", and "crime", just for starters, admit varying degrees of propriety.

Take, for example, the term "just punishment". Who determines what is just, and when is a punishment just Why is it a just punishment to sentence to death a serial killer found guilty of murdering a dozen victims, compared to the "just punishment" of a politician who sent tens of thousands of soldiers to die in a "useless" war (think thirty-plus years ago) by not getting re-elected to another term While one might say that serial murder is an unjust crime and that fighting a just war is not, the fact that legal concepts resting on a foundation of laws created by men (and women) allows a flexibility of interpretation that strikes at the core of our discussion.

Doubts about the shaky foundations on which an argument (or a part of it) rests should at the least lead one to conclude with intellectual honesty that in the face of uncertainty, would it not be best to stay on the side of caution Such is the basic position of this writer given the complex nature of the issue at hand: that capital punishment must be abolished because the empirical evidence on which to establish intellectual certainty seems to be in favor of a cautious course of action.

Before considering the empirical evidence such as statistics and the more commonly-known public arguments presented by either side, the most logical starting point to defend this writer's intellectual position is to define the concepts that facilitate our understanding of the issue: the value of human life, justice as a concept and a system, crime and punishment, order, and society.

The core of the capital punishment issue is the value of human life. Those who support the death penalty cite it as a core of their argument for social justice to be satisfied. They argue that putting to death the person who took away a life (or many lives) would give just satisfaction to the victim, to those the victim left behind (family and friends), and also to the social order, a characteristic of society whereby justice needs to be upheld for order to be established. A corollary is that if justice is not served by a like-for-like punishment where the criminal is made to suffer the same fate (death) as the victim, society would end in chaos as people would not be deterred from committing the same crime (Anderson, 2005).