I will pay for the following essay Rhetorical Analysis: Capitalism: A Love Story. The essay is to be 4 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.Download file to se

I will pay for the following essay Rhetorical Analysis: Capitalism: A Love Story. The essay is to be 4 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.

Moore strategically releases the documentary at a time when he knows that Americans are just recovering from the consequences of economic meltdown and financial crisis. The financial crisis left many Americans homeless and jobless and with tremendous disillusionment. Moore capitalizes on this state of affairs to rally Americans against capitalism and those who promote it. The rhetorical situation that perhaps inspired Moore to film the documentary is that Americans are quickly losing confidence in the structures and institutions of governance, and with the leadership. Leaders constantly make promises that they do not fulfill and the policies they implement are neither effective nor sustainable. In essence, Americans are in desperate need for change that they even elected President Obama the moment he promised them change.

Michael Moore is an accomplished film maker who uses his talent for an apparent philanthropic quest to educate Americans on political, social and governance issues affecting them. One his most famous works is the Fahrenheit 9/11 provides controversial accounts of the events that supposedly led to the 9/11 attacks. That his works are controversial is no doubt and the issues he tackles are weighty and as a result he never lacks audience. He has taken the position of an activist against the oppression of the common people by the rich and the powerful. Consequently, many people identify with him and would actually believe his stories. Perhaps his credibility stems from the fact that he seems to sympathize with the “oppressed”. Moore’s intention in the documentary is straightforward. Moore seeks to attack corporate organizations and key institutions that are mostly mandated with the task of service delivery to Americans. According to Moore, these corporate organizations and institutions are the same ones that are stealing from the very people they are supposed to protect. Moore seeks to attack these corporate organizations and institutions while at the same time persuade Americans persuade Americans into following his beliefs. Essentially, Moore targets the lower class and the bourgeoisie because they are the ones who have mostly been affected by economic crisis. The lower class and the bourgeoisie perhaps hold Moore with high regard because they see him as the one person who has been brave enough to speak against the rich and mighty. Regardless of whether Moore’s postulations are real or not, the fact is that he will always have people to listen to him and to encourage him to continue what many believe is whistle blowing. The primary objective of Moore in the film is to bring out the fact that the real thieves are the corporate leaders. The leaders fleece out public funds and then use their offices to protect them from being discovered and possible prosecution. In the beginning of the film we see rather naive and inexperienced robbers who are caught on camera. In essence, these robbers will soon find themselves locked for a very long time in prison. Moore then brings into perspective the scandals that have recently hit the American nation. For instance, Moore touches on the controversy surrounding the bailouts given to institutions during economic crisis where most of the money was used to pay CEOs. Moore also outlines that in most instances CEOs of banks steal huge chunks of money and use their offices and connections to avoid being caught. Moore also explains that as some Americans were being evicted out of their homes, some insurance companies were actually gaining.