Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS No. 00-00001 SLYE KARGUY, Petitioner v.
IN THE
COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS
No. 00-00001
SLYE KARGUY,
Petitioner
v.
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS,
Respondent
ON APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF
THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS FROM
THE WORCESTER DISTRICT COURT
BRIEF OF PETITIONER
Some Lawyer
Attorney for Petitioner
4567 Any Lane
Anytown, Fiction 37214
STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION
Mass. Const. Pt. 1, art. XIV Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 276, § 2 (West)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
Did law enforcement violate search & seizure laws and violation of curtilage laws, to obtain the evidence against Mr, Karguy by flying 400 feet above the Petitioner's garage? Did the police conduct unlawful surveillance? Was the aerial surveillance lawful? Was there probable cause for surveillance and then search? Was this warrantless search lawful? Did the use of drone by law enforcement lawful?
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS