Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.

QUESTION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS No. 00-00001 SLYE KARGUY, Petitioner v.

IN THE

 COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS

No. 00-00001

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

SLYE KARGUY,

                                                                                                                                   Petitioner

v.

THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS,

                                                                                                                                   Respondent

ON APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF

THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS FROM

THE WORCESTER DISTRICT COURT

BRIEF OF PETITIONER

Some Lawyer

Attorney for Petitioner

4567 Any Lane

Anytown, Fiction 37214

STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION

Mass. Const. Pt. 1, art. XIV Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 276, § 2 (West)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

Did law enforcement violate search & seizure laws and violation of curtilage laws, to obtain the evidence against Mr, Karguy by flying 400 feet above the Petitioner's garage? Did the police conduct unlawful surveillance? Was the aerial surveillance lawful? Was there  probable cause for surveillance and then search? Was this warrantless search lawful? Did the  use of drone by law enforcement lawful?

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

Show more
LEARN MORE EFFECTIVELY AND GET BETTER GRADES!
Ask a Question