Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Is it possible to have a public policy concerning terrorism and then violate that policy in practice?
Is it possible to have a public policy concerning terrorism and then violate that policy in practice? For example, the United States says that it does not negotiate with terrorists. In reality, the government often negotiates with terrorists. In what ways is the United States' relationship with the MeK similar?
• If the United States establishes either a formal—or informal—relationship with the MeK, how can the Department of State maintain a listing condemning state sponsors of terrorism?
• What is the moral responsibility of democratic governments in maintaining standards about international terrorism? Is it morally acceptable to engage in a relationship with any organization that practices terrorism? The United States has done so in the past. What implications does this have on the moral force of public policy?
