Need an argumentative essay on Can Happiness be learned Why or how. Needs to be 5 pages. Please no plagiarism.To these philosophers, happiness is a spiritual gift that God has given to man through gra

Need an argumentative essay on Can Happiness be learned Why or how. Needs to be 5 pages. Please no plagiarism.

To these philosophers, happiness is a spiritual gift that God has given to man through grace. During the Enlightenment Era, however, this theological definition was radically changed into a utilitarian concept. According to this philosophy, the maximum surplus of pleasure over pain is the cardinal goal of human striving. At this point, it is crucial to note that the aforementioned developments have shifted the concept of happiness from a purely metaphysical notion to a more tangible state of human experience. As empirical science continues to gain worldwide acceptance as the purveyor of objective reality, philosophical methods slowly lose its credibility. If happiness is the end goal of man, defining and describing this state is of utmost importance. By revisiting its nature, we intend to examine the ways through which man can attain happiness, either aided by science or philosophical methods. Absolute Happiness in Philosophy There are two major distinctions when it comes to the conception of happiness. Firstly, from a philosophical standpoint, happiness is defined as man’s end goal, making it absolute or objective. As such, the drive to search for happiness is innate in man because of his imperfect nature. Thus, happiness is the attainment of human perfection. By introducing the concept of perfection, philosophy is able to reinforce the metaphysical character of happiness—since happiness is perfection, and perfection entails the transcendence of the physical, happiness, then, is be found on the spiritual. The improbability of attaining happiness on the physical realm is hinted in the article entitled In Praise of Grumpiness by Sue Ferguson, in which she described humans as being situated in an endless race to happiness. She defined this as adaptation, which proves that despite wealth, man cannot still be happy. Because of this logic, philosophy has equated happiness as being with God, the Ultimate Being. The worthiness of being with God, however, has specific requirements. In this light, man’s readiness hinges on the cultivation of character, which emanates from the proper practice of human virtues. Therefore, for man to be worthy of being with God—which equates to absolute happiness—man must be morally good. Subjective Happiness in Psychology When it comes to science, there are obvious differences in the definition of happiness. Although the absolutist notion of happiness is still regarded, which is described in same article entitled In State of Grumpiness as being in three levels—visceral sensations of joy. feelings of satisfaction. and judgments about the overall quality of life—emphasis is now given on its subjective attainment. This creates an entirely different route as happiness becomes an arbitrary choice of man, which culminates in an actual and physical state of well-being. As succinctly argued by Sue Ferguson in the same article stated above, science does not focus on an ideal conception of happiness because of its complete and lasting nature. Since such happiness necessitates high standards of thinking and empirical study as it involves a perfect, pure, and perpetual object of study, psychology emphasizes more on actual happiness. In this sense, happiness in psychology is about self well-being.